Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $107M | $926M | $7.05B | $2.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $336M | $3.21B | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $68M | $550M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 72.4% | 67.7% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 13.2x | 9.7x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $42M | $4.01B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $53M | $511M | $657M |
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Financial Ban… (SFBC) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 105.9% 10Y total return vs HFWA's 95.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.27 vs COLB's 1.29, lower leverage
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 58.1%
- PEG 1.52 vs WAFD's 3.54
- Beta 0.96, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- NIM 3.2% vs WAFD's 2.5%
COLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 15.0x)
- 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0%
- +31.9% vs SFBC's -15.0%
WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs COLB's 1.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.9% vs SFBC's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% |
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 3 of 6 categories
COLB leads 1 • SFBC leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 52.2x SFBC's $62M. HFWA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFBC's 11.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $336M | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $80M | $895M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $68M | $550M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $86M | $724M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +72.4% | +67.7% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +20.1% | +17.1% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +25.5% | +22.0% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +85.7% | +5.9% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 14% valuation discount to SFBC's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HFWA offers better value at 1.59x vs WAFD's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $926M | $7.1B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | $916M | $10.6B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.01x | 13.90x | 12.89x | 13.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.25x | 9.69x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.59x | — | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.13x | 11.50x | 11.79x | 12.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 2.76x | 2.20x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.02x | 1.12x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.33x | 10.81x | 9.99x | 13.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFWA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLB delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for SFBC. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +7.5% | +8.4% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +5.2% | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$117M | -$10M | $3.5B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $53M | $511M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $42M | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,386 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +31.9% total return vs SFBC's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HFWA at 21.7% vs SFBC's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +17.0% | +7.8% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.0% | +20.4% | +31.9% | +27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +80.3% | +65.9% | +45.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +8.0% | -16.1% | +21.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.9% | +95.0% | +39.6% | +78.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | +21.7% | +18.4% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFBC and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SFBC's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.96x | 1.29x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.69 | $28.90 | $32.70 | $36.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.67 | $21.32 | $21.91 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +94.3% | +90.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 53.9 | 53.3 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 271K | 2.7M | 603K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COLB and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.0% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -1.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.81% vs SFBC's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.33 | $32.90 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.95 | $1.13 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.6% | +1.5% | +3.7% |
HFWA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COLB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SFBC vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Heritage Financial Corporation wins at 1. 52x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 54x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +21. 4%, compared to -16. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBC returned +105. 9% versus COLB's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning COLB is approximately 374% more volatile than SFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 11. 6% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLB leads at 23. 4% versus 14. 1% for SFBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 54x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 2x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 15. 0% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC).
09Is SFBC or HFWA or COLB or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 1. 8% yield, +105. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFBC: +105. 9%, COLB: +39. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFBC and HFWA and COLB and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.