Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBS vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SFBS vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.35B | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $108M |
SFBS vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 228.4 | +128.4% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBS vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.23
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 21.6%
- 254.7% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.4%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 0.01x
- Beta 0.94, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.01x
- Beta 0.94 vs SFBS's 1.23, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 14.3x), PEG 1.24 vs 4.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CVBF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SFBS's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs SFBS's +10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CVBF's 0.4% |
SFBS vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SFBS vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.6x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFBS's 27.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $346M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $256M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.8% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFBS and CVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 14% valuation discount to SFBS's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SFBS offers better value at 1.56x vs CVBF's 4.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.75x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.47x | 14.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.56x | 4.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.85x | 13.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.28x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVBF leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. CVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SFBS and CVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFBS five years ago would be worth $12,771 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,190 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, CVBF leads with a +13.6% total return vs SFBS's +10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.9% vs SFBS's 21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.5% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | +95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.7% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs SFBS's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.64 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $67.20 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 317K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SFBS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFBS as "Buy" and CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 13.0% for SFBS (target: $90). CVBF is the only dividend payer here at 3.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFBS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
SFBS vs CVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBS or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(SFBS) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBS or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBS or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(SFBS) delivered a total return of +27. 7%, compared to +11. 9% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +254. 7% versus CVBF's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBS or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning SFBS is approximately 31% more volatile than CVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBS or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(SFBS) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBS or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 27. 2% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 33. 6% for SFBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFBS or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for CVB Financial Corp. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 0% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFBS or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield) pays a dividend. SFBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SFBS or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVBF: +67. 4%, SFBS: +254. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFBS and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CVBF pays a dividend while SFBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.