Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $816M | $6.81B | $118.83B | $2.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $675M | $1.75B | $37.70B | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $81M | $1.37B | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 25.3% | 20.6% | 7.5% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 9.4% | 9.0% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 60.3x | 44.0x | 50.2x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $1.09B | $26.61B | $902M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $89M | $269M | $3.22B | $360M |
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 95.1 | -4.9% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BROS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs SG's 0.4%
- 4.6% margin vs SG's 2.5%
SBUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 2.3%
- 114.8% 10Y total return vs BROS's 46.1%
- Lower P/E (44.0x vs 50.2x)
- Beta 0.99 vs SG's 1.95
SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
- Beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs SG's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (44.0x vs 50.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs SG's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs SG's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs SG's -61.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SG's 2.0%, ROIC 17.7% vs -14.1% |
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SBUX leads in 2 of 6 categories
BROS leads 1 • SG leads 1 • SHAK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 55.9x SG's $675M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.6% (BROS) to 2.5% (SG). On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $675M | $1.7B | $37.7B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $244M | $5.1B | $173M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $81M | $1.4B | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | $148M | $2.3B | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +25.3% | +20.6% | +7.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +9.4% | +9.0% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +4.6% | +3.6% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | +8.5% | +6.2% | +1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +30.8% | +5.4% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | 0.0% | -62.3% | -110.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 63.5x trailing earnings, SHAK trades at a 25% valuation discount to BROS's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHAK's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BROS's 27.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $816M | $6.8B | $118.8B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $7.6B | $142.2B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.03x | 85.05x | 63.96x | 63.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 60.32x | 44.00x | 50.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.60x | 27.01x | 17.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 4.16x | 3.20x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.28x | 7.50x | — | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 125.12x | 48.66x | 49.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SG and SBUX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $4 for SG. SG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHAK's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs SG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +9.2% | — | +7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +2.7% | +4.2% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.1% | +7.7% | +17.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.8% | +6.4% | +16.2% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 1.21x | — | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $265M | $820M | $23.4B | $542M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $89M | $269M | $3.2B | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $1.1B | $26.6B | $902M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2320.23x | 11.85x | 6.03x | 16.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BROS and SBUX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BROS five years ago would be worth $14,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,388 for SG. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +29.0% total return vs SG's -61.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BROS at 18.4% vs SG's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | -13.8% | +24.9% | -17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.6% | -9.5% | +29.0% | -32.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | +66.0% | +3.8% | +3.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | +46.1% | +0.8% | -22.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | +46.1% | +114.8% | +98.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +18.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SBUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBUX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SG's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SG's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.83x | 0.99x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.63 | $77.88 | $107.55 | $144.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.49 | $44.58 | $77.99 | $67.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +68.8% | +96.9% | +47.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 62.8 | 69.1 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 4.1M | 7.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SBUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SG as "Hold", BROS as "Buy", SBUX as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.6% upside for SHAK (target: $121) vs 4.0% for SBUX (target: $108). SBUX is the only dividend payer here at 2.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.51 | $74.45 | $108.38 | $120.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 21 | 59 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBUX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). BROS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SG vs BROS vs SBUX vs SHAK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) offers the better valuation at 63. 5x trailing P/E (50. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
On trailing P/E, Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is the cheapest at 63. 5x versus Dutch Bros Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Starbucks Corporation is actually cheaper at 44. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
Over the past 5 years, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) delivered a total return of +46. 1%, compared to -86. 1% for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBUX returned +114. 8% versus SG's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Sweetgreen, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning SG is approximately 98% more volatile than SBUX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 163% for Shake Shack Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 0. 4% for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
0% net margin versus -19. 7% for Sweetgreen, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BROS leads at 9. 8% versus -16. 4% for SG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BROS leads at 25. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) trades at 44.
0x forward P/E versus 60. 3x for Dutch Bros Inc. — 16. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHAK: 74. 6% to $120. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK?
In this comparison, SBUX (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SG, BROS, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SG or BROS or SBUX or SHAK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 2. 3% yield, +114. 8% 10Y return). Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBUX: +114. 8%, SG: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SG and BROS and SBUX and SHAK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock. SBUX pays a dividend while SG, BROS, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.