Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Restaurants
Restaurants
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Grocery Stores | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $816M | $627M | $266M | $6.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $675M | $1.51B | $1.35B | $1.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $-505M | $-69M | $81M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 13.7% | 27.6% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | -28.2% | -2.8% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 4.0x | 60.3x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $1.42B | $3.12B | $1.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $89M | $-42M | $52M | $269M |
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 16.8 | -83.2% |
| Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DNUT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.51 vs SG's 1.95
JACK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 6.3%
- Beta 1.69, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.51x
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 60.3x)
- 6.3% yield, vs DNUT's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BROS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
- 46.1% 10Y total return vs JACK's -59.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.83, current ratio 1.49x
- 27.9% revenue growth vs DNUT's -8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs DNUT's -8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 60.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs DNUT's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs SG's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, vs DNUT's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.5% vs SG's -61.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs DNUT's -19.8%, ROIC 7.7% vs -1.1% |
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BROS leads in 3 of 6 categories
JACK leads 1 • SG leads 0 • DNUT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.6x SG's $675M. BROS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNUT's -33.4%. On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $675M | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | -$292M | $16M | $244M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | -$505M | -$69M | $81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$6M | -$10M | $148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +13.7% | +27.6% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | -28.2% | -2.8% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | -33.4% | -5.2% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | -0.4% | -0.7% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -2.2% | -25.5% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +20.0% | +33.7% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DNUT's 20.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JACK's 82.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $816M | $627M | $266M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $2.1B | $3.3B | $7.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.03x | -1.20x | -3.29x | 85.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.03x | 60.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.17x | 82.92x | 27.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 0.41x | 0.18x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.28x | 0.92x | — | 7.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.58x | 125.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-74 for DNUT. SG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DNUT's 2.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BROS scores 6/9 vs SG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -74.1% | — | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -19.8% | -2.7% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.1% | -1.1% | -0.6% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.8% | -1.4% | -0.8% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 2.10x | — | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $265M | $1.5B | $3.1B | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $89M | -$42M | $52M | $269M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $1.4B | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2320.23x | -6.61x | -0.51x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BROS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BROS five years ago would be worth $14,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,388 for SG. Over the past 12 months, BROS leads with a -9.5% total return vs SG's -61.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BROS at 18.4% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | -10.8% | -25.9% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.6% | -15.9% | -47.8% | -9.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | -73.6% | -81.2% | +66.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -80.2% | -82.8% | +46.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -80.2% | -59.5% | +46.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | -35.8% | -42.7% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DNUT and BROS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DNUT is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SG's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BROS currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs SG's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.51x | 1.69x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.63 | $5.73 | $29.40 | $77.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.49 | $2.50 | $8.91 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +63.5% | +47.2% | +68.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 50.6 | 58.4 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 2.5M | 837K | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JACK and BROS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SG as "Hold", DNUT as "Buy", JACK as "Hold", BROS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.6% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 9.3% for SG (target: $8). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.25% vs DNUT's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.51 | $4.50 | $19.92 | $74.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 41 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +6.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 | $0.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.9% | 0.0% |
BROS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SG vs DNUT vs JACK vs BROS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 6% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT). Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) offers the better valuation at 85. 0x trailing P/E (60. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
Over the past 5 years, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) delivered a total return of +46. 1%, compared to -86. 1% for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BROS returned +46. 1% versus SG's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Krispy Kreme, Inc.
(DNUT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Sweetgreen, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning SG is approximately 29% more volatile than DNUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 2% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -8. 6% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dutch Bros Inc. grew EPS 103. 2% year-over-year, compared to -170. 8% for Krispy Kreme, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 9% net margin versus -33. 9% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BROS leads at 9. 8% versus -16. 4% for SG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JACK leads at 28. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc.
(JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 60. 3x for Dutch Bros Inc. — 56. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 43. 6% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS?
In this comparison, JACK (6.
3% yield), DNUT (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SG, BROS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SG or DNUT or JACK or BROS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Krispy Kreme, Inc.
(DNUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 9% yield). Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DNUT: -80. 2%, SG: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SG and DNUT and JACK and BROS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SG (Consumer Cyclical) and DNUT (Consumer Defensive) and JACK (Consumer Cyclical) and BROS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DNUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock. DNUT, JACK pay a dividend while SG, BROS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.