Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Residential Construction
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $33K | $8.79B | $4.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $14.82B | $2.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $292M | $269M |
| Gross Margin | -87.3% | 29.9% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -375.8% | 4.2% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.1x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $5.65B | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $376K | $182M | $356M |
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 501.2 | +401.2% |
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 303.5 | +203.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGBX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs CVCO's 448.0%
- Better valuation composite
CVCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 12.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 3.00x
- PEG 0.98 vs BLDR's 1.78
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SGBX's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.0% vs SGBX's -96.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 19.4% vs -625.7% |
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 2 • SGBX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 4381.0x SGBX's $3M. CVCO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGBX's -5.7%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $14.8B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $1.2B | $221M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $292M | $269M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $862M | $205M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -87.3% | +29.9% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +4.2% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +2.0% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | +5.8% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | -10.1% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.9% | -151.2% | -19.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 12% valuation discount to CVCO's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CVCO offers better value at 1.13x vs BLDR's 2.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32,963 | $8.8B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $14.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 20.43x | 23.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.07x | 20.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.59x | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.35x | 20.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.58x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.04x | 3.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.30x | 29.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVCO scores 6/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.2% | +6.9% | +24.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | +2.6% | +18.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -625.7% | +6.4% | +19.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.5% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.30x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $5.5B | -$311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $375,873 | $182M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $5.6B | $45M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.81x | 2.19x | 211.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, CVCO leads with a -7.0% total return vs SGBX's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVCO at 16.4% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | -24.0% | -18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.3% | -25.0% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -30.1% | +57.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +51.8% | +123.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +614.8% | +448.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.5% | -11.2% | +16.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGBX and CVCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVCO currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.65x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.00 | $151.03 | $713.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.79 | $73.40 | $393.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.0% | +52.6% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 42.8 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 503K | 2.4M | 142K |
Analyst Outlook
BLDR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). SGBX is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.92 | $475.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $13.85 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% | +3.3% |
CVCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SGBX vs BLDR vs CVCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGBX or BLDR or CVCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cavco Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +614. 8% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 271% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe & Green Holdings Corp. grew EPS 69. 1% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVCO leads at 9. 4% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLDR leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGBX or BLDR or CVCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGBX or BLDR or CVCO?
In this comparison, SGBX (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. BLDR, CVCO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGBX or BLDR or CVCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 100. 0% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGBX and BLDR and CVCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGBX (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and CVCO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGBX pays a dividend while BLDR, CVCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.