Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SGBX
Safe & Green Holdings Corp.

Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$33K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.17B
5Y Perf.+258.0%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.79B
5Y Perf.+401.2%
CVCO
Cavco Industries, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.57B
5Y Perf.+203.5%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.84B
5Y Perf.+409.9%

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SGBX logoSGBX
PATK logoPATK
BLDR logoBLDR
CVCO logoCVCO
IBP logoIBP
IndustryManufacturing - Metal FabricationFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesConstructionResidential ConstructionResidential Construction
Market Cap$33K$3.17B$8.79B$4.57B$5.84B
Revenue (TTM)$3M$3.94B$14.82B$2.20B$2.95B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$136M$292M$269M$255M
Gross Margin-87.3%22.5%29.9%23.4%33.9%
Operating Margin-375.8%7.0%4.2%9.8%12.7%
Forward P/E18.2x14.1x20.2x19.5x
Total Debt$7M$1.64B$5.65B$45M$1.05B
Cash & Equiv.$376K$26M$182M$356M$322M

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SGBX
PATK
BLDR
CVCO
IBP
StockMay 20Mar 26Return
Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX)1000.1-99.9%
Patrick Industries,… (PATK)100358.0+258.0%
Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR)100501.2+401.2%
Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO)100303.5+203.5%
Installed Building … (IBP)100509.9+409.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CVCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. BLDR and IBP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SGBX
Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick

SGBX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 0.45, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.08x
  • Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65
  • 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PATK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.93, current ratio 2.51x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
The Value Play

BLDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 20.2x)
Best for: value
CVCO
Cavco Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

CVCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 12.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 12.3% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9%
  • 12.2% margin vs SGBX's -5.7%
  • 18.2% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 19.4% vs -625.7%
Best for: growth exposure
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs CVCO's 448.0%
  • PEG 0.80 vs BLDR's 1.78
  • +34.0% vs SGBX's -96.3%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCVCO logoCVCO12.3% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9%
ValueBLDR logoBLDRLower P/E (14.1x vs 20.2x)
Quality / MarginsCVCO logoCVCO12.2% margin vs SGBX's -5.7%
Stability / SafetySGBX logoSGBXBeta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65
DividendsSGBX logoSGBX100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)IBP logoIBP+34.0% vs SGBX's -96.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CVCO logoCVCO18.2% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 19.4% vs -625.7%

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SGBXSafe & Green Holdings Corp.
FY 2024
Office
96.3%$5M
Hospitality
3.7%$181,719
PATKPatrick Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Manufactured Housing
31.3%$681M
Marine
27.9%$606M
Industrial
23.1%$503M
Powersports
17.7%$384M
BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Building Products And Services
26.8%$4.1B
Lumber And Lumber Sheet Goods
25.5%$3.9B
Windows Doors And Millwork
25.3%$3.8B
Manufactured Products
22.5%$3.4B
CVCOCavco Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Factory Built Housing
95.9%$1.9B
Financial Services
4.1%$82M
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Installation
50.0%$2.8B
Insulation
30.9%$1.7B
Shower Doors Shelving And Mirrors
4.0%$219M
Other Building Products
3.3%$184M
Garage Doors
3.1%$173M
Waterproofing
2.9%$161M
Rain Gutters
2.3%$125M
Other (2)
3.5%$193M

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPATKLAGGINGIBP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CVCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 4381.0x SGBX's $3M. CVCO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGBX's -5.7%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$3.9B$14.8B$2.2B$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M$445M$1.2B$221M$656M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M$136M$292M$269M$255M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$194M$862M$205M$63M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-87.3%+22.5%+29.9%+23.4%+33.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.8%+7.0%+4.2%+9.8%+12.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.7%+3.5%+2.0%+12.2%+8.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-155.0%+4.9%+5.8%+9.3%+2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-40.0%-0.6%-10.1%+11.3%-3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.9%-0.9%-151.2%-19.1%-21.3%
CVCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 16% valuation discount to PATK's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs BLDR's 2.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
Market CapShares × price$32,963$3.2B$8.8B$4.6B$5.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$4.8B$14.3B$4.3B$6.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x24.45x20.43x23.29x22.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.24x14.07x20.24x19.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.59x1.13x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.72x10.35x20.32x13.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x0.80x0.58x2.27x1.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.79x2.04x3.74x8.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.86x10.30x29.09x19.41x
BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CVCO and IBP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-77.2%+11.6%+6.9%+24.7%+37.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-35.6%+4.4%+2.6%+18.2%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-625.7%+7.6%+6.4%+19.4%+20.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.2%+8.5%+17.4%+22.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926568
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.39x1.30x0.04x1.48x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M$1.6B$5.5B-$311M$731M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$375,873$26M$182M$356M$322M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$1.6B$5.6B$45M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.81x3.40x2.19x211.73x9.47x
Evenly matched — CVCO and IBP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PATK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs SGBX's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-52.9%-13.2%-24.0%-18.5%-18.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.3%+19.6%-25.0%-7.0%+34.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+128.2%-30.1%+57.7%+98.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+56.6%+51.8%+123.5%+80.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+395.2%+614.8%+448.0%+650.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-87.5%+31.7%-11.2%+16.4%+25.6%
PATK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SGBX and CVCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVCO currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.93x1.65x1.20x1.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$96.00$148.50$151.03$713.01$349.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.79$80.35$73.40$393.53$150.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.0%+64.2%+52.6%+67.6%+62.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.242.842.846.255.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded503K469K2.4M142K344K
Evenly matched — SGBX and CVCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SGBX and IBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PATK as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy", IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). For income investors, SGBX offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs IBP's 1.49%.

MetricSGBX logoSGBXSafe & Green Hold…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…CVCO logoCVCOCavco Industries,…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$126.50$109.92$475.00$293.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1743227
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+1.7%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1125
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$13.85$1.60$3.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%+4.7%+3.3%+3.0%
Evenly matched — SGBX and IBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CVCO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallPatrick Industries, Inc. (PATK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SGBX vs PATK vs BLDR vs CVCO vs IBP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cavco Industries, Inc.

(CVCO) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.

(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.

(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.

(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 271% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cavco Industries, Inc.

(CVCO) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe & Green Holdings Corp. grew EPS 69. 1% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBP leads at 34. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP?

In this comparison, SGBX (100.

0% yield), PATK (1. 7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR, CVCO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SGBX or PATK or BLDR or CVCO or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.

(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 100. 0% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SGBX and PATK and BLDR and CVCO and IBP?

These companies operate in different sectors (SGBX (Industrials) and PATK (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials) and CVCO (Consumer Cyclical) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGBX, PATK, IBP pay a dividend while BLDR, CVCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SGBX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $2B
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PATK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLDR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVCO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SGBX and PATK and BLDR and CVCO and IBP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SGBX: -40.0% · PATK: -0.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.