Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SGHC vs BYD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • GG
Market Cap$6.56B
5Y Perf.+33.0%
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.42B
5Y Perf.+121.4%

SGHC vs BYD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SGHC logoSGHC
BYD logoBYD
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$6.56B$6.42B
Revenue (TTM)$2.00B$4.09B
Net Income (TTM)$200M$1.84B
Gross Margin52.4%42.1%
Operating Margin20.3%21.4%
Forward P/E17.5x11.9x
Total Debt$73M$3.27B
Cash & Equiv.$388M$353M

SGHC vs BYDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SGHC
BYD
StockNov 20May 26Return
Super Group (SGHC) … (SGHC)100133.0+33.0%
Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD)100221.4+121.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SGHC vs BYD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BYD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Super Group (SGHC) Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
The Growth Play

SGHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 18.2%, EPS growth 11.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.25x
  • 18.2% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
The Income Pick

BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
  • 365.7% 10Y total return vs SGHC's 40.3%
  • Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.54x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSGHC logoSGHC18.2% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1%
ValueBYD logoBYDLower P/E (11.9x vs 17.5x)
Quality / MarginsBYD logoBYD45.0% margin vs SGHC's 10.0%
Stability / SafetyBYD logoBYDBeta 0.86 vs SGHC's 1.26
DividendsBYD logoBYD0.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SGHC's 0.8%
Momentum (1Y)SGHC logoSGHC+47.6% vs BYD's +21.2%
Efficiency (ROA)BYD logoBYD27.9% ROA vs SGHC's 16.8%, ROIC 12.3% vs 63.3%

SGHC vs BYD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SGHCSuper Group (SGHC) Limited
FY 2024
Other
100.0%$7M
BYDBoyd Gaming Corporation
FY 2025
Casino
78.0%$2.6B
Food and Beverage
9.2%$310M
Occupancy
5.7%$191M
Product and Service, Other
4.3%$145M
Management Fee
2.9%$99M

SGHC vs BYD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSGHCLAGGINGBYD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SGHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BYD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 2.0x SGHC's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGHC's 10.0%. On growth, SGHC holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$468M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$200M$1.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$388M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.4%+42.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.3%+21.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.0%+45.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.8%+9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.4%+2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.6%-6.8%
SGHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BYD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 92% valuation discount to SGHC's 50.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BYD's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGHC's 16.9x.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$6.6B$6.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.2B$9.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS50.17x3.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.48x11.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.93x7.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.29x1.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.61x2.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.96x16.52x
BYD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SGHC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $27 for SGHC. SGHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYD's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGHC scores 6/9 vs BYD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+26.9%+91.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.8%+27.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+63.3%+12.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+41.2%+15.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x1.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$315M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$388M$353M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$73M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense63.44x15.78x
SGHC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SGHC five years ago would be worth $13,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,011 for BYD. Over the past 12 months, SGHC leads with a +47.6% total return vs BYD's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGHC at 53.4% vs BYD's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.0%-0.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.6%+21.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+260.9%+24.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.0%+30.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.3%+365.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+53.4%+7.5%
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGHC's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SGHC's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.26x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.38$89.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.08$69.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.2%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.549.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M932K
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SGHC as "Buy" and BYD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for SGHC (target: $19) vs 11.5% for BYD (target: $95). For income investors, BYD offers the higher dividend yield at 0.84% vs SGHC's 0.83%.

MetricSGHC logoSGHCSuper Group (SGHC…BYD logoBYDBoyd Gaming Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$95.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts738
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises24
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$0.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+12.1%
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SGHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BYD leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallSuper Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SGHC vs BYD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SGHC or BYD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger pick with 18.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SGHC or BYD?

On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.

8x versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited at 50. 2x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SGHC or BYD?

Over the past 5 years, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) delivered a total return of +35.

0%, compared to +30. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus SGHC's +40. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SGHC or BYD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

86β versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited's 1. 26β — meaning SGHC is approximately 46% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 125% for Boyd Gaming Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SGHC or BYD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is pulling ahead at 18.

2% versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super Group (SGHC) Limited grew EPS 1138% year-over-year, compared to 264. 5% for Boyd Gaming Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BYD leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SGHC or BYD?

Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Super Group (SGHC) Limited — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYD leads at 21. 4% versus 15. 5% for SGHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SGHC or BYD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.

9x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Super Group (SGHC) Limited — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGHC: 46. 5% to $19. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SGHC or BYD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 8% for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC).

09

Is SGHC or BYD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, SGHC: +40. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SGHC and BYD?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SGHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SGHC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BYD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SGHC and BYD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SGHC: 5.4% · BYD: 2.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SGHC: 10.0% · BYD: 45.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SGHC: 50.2x · BYD: 3.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.