Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SGHC vs BYD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SGHC vs BYD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $6.56B | $6.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.00B | $4.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $200M | $1.84B |
| Gross Margin | 52.4% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $3.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $388M | $353M |
SGHC vs BYD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (SGHC) … (SGHC) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGHC vs BYD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.2%, EPS growth 11.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.25x
- 18.2% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1%
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- 365.7% 10Y total return vs SGHC's 40.3%
- Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.2% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs SGHC's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs SGHC's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SGHC's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.6% vs BYD's +21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs SGHC's 16.8%, ROIC 12.3% vs 63.3% |
SGHC vs BYD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGHC vs BYD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 2.0x SGHC's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGHC's 10.0%. On growth, SGHC holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $468M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $200M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $388M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.4% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | -6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BYD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 92% valuation discount to SGHC's 50.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BYD's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGHC's 16.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.17x | 3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.48x | 11.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.93x | 7.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.61x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.96x | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $27 for SGHC. SGHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYD's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGHC scores 6/9 vs BYD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.9% | +91.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | +27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +63.3% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.2% | +15.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$315M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $388M | $353M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 63.44x | 15.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGHC five years ago would be worth $13,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,011 for BYD. Over the past 12 months, SGHC leads with a +47.6% total return vs BYD's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGHC at 53.4% vs BYD's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.6% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +260.9% | +24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.0% | +30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +365.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.4% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGHC's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SGHC's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.38 | $89.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.08 | $69.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 932K |
Analyst Outlook
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SGHC as "Buy" and BYD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for SGHC (target: $19) vs 11.5% for BYD (target: $95). For income investors, BYD offers the higher dividend yield at 0.84% vs SGHC's 0.83%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.1% |
SGHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BYD leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
SGHC vs BYD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGHC or BYD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger pick with 18.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGHC or BYD?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited at 50. 2x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGHC or BYD?
Over the past 5 years, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) delivered a total return of +35.
0%, compared to +30. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus SGHC's +40. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGHC or BYD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited's 1. 26β — meaning SGHC is approximately 46% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 125% for Boyd Gaming Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGHC or BYD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is pulling ahead at 18.
2% versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super Group (SGHC) Limited grew EPS 1138% year-over-year, compared to 264. 5% for Boyd Gaming Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BYD leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGHC or BYD?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Super Group (SGHC) Limited — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYD leads at 21. 4% versus 15. 5% for SGHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGHC or BYD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Super Group (SGHC) Limited — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGHC: 46. 5% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGHC or BYD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 8% for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC).
09Is SGHC or BYD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, SGHC: +40. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGHC and BYD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.