SGHC vs FLUT

For growth investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger pick with 18.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 6% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) offers the better valuation at 50. 2x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) delivered a total return of +35.

0%, compared to -50. 7% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SGHC returned +40. 3% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited's 1. 26β — meaning SGHC is approximately 2% more volatile than FLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 138% for Flutter Entertainment plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is pulling ahead at 18.

2% versus 16. 6% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super Group (SGHC) Limited grew EPS 1138% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

7% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGHC leads at 15. 5% versus 6. 3% for FLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.

5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Super Group (SGHC) Limited — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.

In this comparison, SGHC (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

26), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGHC: +40. 3%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SGHC pays a dividend while FLUT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.