Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $6.56B | $17.64B | $12.50B | $9.75B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.00B | $17.02B | $6.05B | $17.72B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $200M | $-455M | $4M | $183M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 52.4% | 44.2% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 4.4% | -0.2% | 5.2% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 16.5x | 99.1x | 22.1x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $13.35B | $1.93B | $56.16B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $388M | $3.83B | $1.60B | $2.06B | $687M |
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (SGHC) … (SGHC) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 134.9 | +34.9% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 24.0 | -76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.25x
- 10.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
- 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
FLUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 23.0x)
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs MGM's 81.8%
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
MGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PENN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.6% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.8% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 63.3% vs 1.8% |
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SGHC leads in 4 of 6 categories
FLUT leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 8.9x SGHC's $2.0B. SGHC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $17.0B | $6.1B | $17.7B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $468M | $2.0B | $266M | $2.0B | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $200M | -$455M | $4M | $183M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $880M | $612M | $1.7B | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.4% | +44.2% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +4.4% | -0.2% | +5.2% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -2.7% | +0.1% | +1.0% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +5.2% | +10.1% | +9.8% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +17.4% | +42.8% | +4.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | -22.3% | +192.9% | -5.9% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLUT and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 50.1x trailing earnings, MGM trades at a 0% valuation discount to SGHC's 50.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLUT's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $17.6B | $12.5B | $9.8B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $27.2B | $12.8B | $63.8B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.17x | -58.47x | -3113.58x | 50.14x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.48x | 16.51x | 99.14x | 22.10x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.93x | 10.69x | 49.42x | 31.61x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 1.08x | 2.06x | 0.56x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.61x | 1.87x | 19.81x | 3.08x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.96x | 16.35x | 19.31x | 5.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHC delivers a 26.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. SGHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.9% | -4.3% | +0.5% | +5.3% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | -1.6% | +0.1% | +0.4% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +63.3% | +4.5% | -0.9% | +1.7% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.2% | +4.6% | -0.6% | +2.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.38x | 3.06x | 17.14x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$315M | $9.5B | $330M | $54.1B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $388M | $3.8B | $1.6B | $2.1B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $13.3B | $1.9B | $56.2B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 63.44x | 0.04x | 1.92x | 1.52x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGHC five years ago would be worth $13,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, SGHC leads with a +47.6% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGHC at 53.4% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | -53.7% | -29.3% | +4.4% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.6% | -58.3% | -27.3% | +20.1% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +260.9% | -49.0% | +4.3% | -12.3% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.0% | -50.7% | -47.9% | -4.5% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | -22.9% | +157.3% | +81.8% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.4% | -20.1% | +1.4% | -4.3% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKNG and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.23x | 1.12x | 1.28x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.38 | $313.69 | $48.78 | $40.94 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.08 | $97.94 | $20.46 | $29.19 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +32.2% | +51.7% | +93.1% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 35.0 | 55.1 | 50.0 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 3.4M | 12.9M | 4.4M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SGHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SGHC as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). SGHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $227.86 | $36.88 | $39.71 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 24 | 48 | 36 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% | +6.6% | +12.6% | +15.8% |
SGHC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SGHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs MGM vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 50. 1x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
On trailing P/E, MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the cheapest at 50.
1x versus Super Group (SGHC) Limited at 50. 2x. On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) delivered a total return of +35.
0%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +157. 3% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 20% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super Group (SGHC) Limited grew EPS 1138% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGHC leads at 15. 5% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN?
In this comparison, SGHC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT, DKNG, MGM, PENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGHC or FLUT or DKNG or MGM or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
26), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGHC: +40. 3%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGHC and FLUT and DKNG and MGM and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGHC pays a dividend while FLUT, DKNG, MGM, PENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.