SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$6.56B
5Y Perf.+33.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SGHC vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-76.0%
SGHC vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SGHC | PENN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $6.56B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.00B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $200M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 52.4% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $388M | $687M |
SGHC vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SGHC
PENN
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (SGHC) … (SGHC) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 24.0 | -76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGHC vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SGHC leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
The Income Pick
SGHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 18.2%, EPS growth 11.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 40.3% 10Y total return vs PENN's 11.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, PENN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SGHC | 18.2% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% |
| Value | SGHC | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 23.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SGHC | 10.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SGHC | Beta 1.26 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SGHC | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SGHC | +47.6% vs PENN's +6.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SGHC | 16.8% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 63.3% vs 1.8% |
SGHC vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
SGHC vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSGHCLAGGINGPENN
PENNPENN Entertainment, I…
1leads
SGHCSuper Group (SGHC) Li…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PENNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SGHC5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PENN4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SGHC9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SGHC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SGHC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 3.5x SGHC's $2.0B. SGHC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $468M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $200M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.4% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +37.5% |
SGHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PENN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGHC's 16.9x.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.17x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.48x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.93x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.61x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.96x | — |
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHC delivers a 26.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. SGHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGHC scores 6/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.9% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +63.3% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.2% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$315M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $388M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 63.44x | -1.02x |
SGHC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SGHC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGHC five years ago would be worth $13,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, SGHC leads with a +47.6% total return vs PENN's +6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGHC at 53.4% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.6% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +260.9% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.0% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.4% | -13.5% |
SGHC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGHC is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SGHC currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs PENN's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.38 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.08 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 4.4M |
SGHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SGHC as "Buy" and PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for SGHC (target: $19) vs 18.5% for PENN (target: $20). SGHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SGHCSuper Group (SGHC… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SGHC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallSuper Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SGHC vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGHC or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger pick with 18.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) offers the better valuation at 50. 2x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGHC or PENN?
On forward P/E, Super Group (SGHC) Limited is actually cheaper at 17.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGHC or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) delivered a total return of +35.
0%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SGHC returned +40. 3% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGHC or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
26β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 7% more volatile than SGHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGHC or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is pulling ahead at 18.
2% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super Group (SGHC) Limited grew EPS 1138% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SGHC leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGHC or PENN?
Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGHC leads at 15. 5% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGHC or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) trades at 17.
5x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGHC: 46. 5% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGHC or PENN?
In this comparison, SGHC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGHC or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
26), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGHC: +40. 3%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGHC and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGHC pays a dividend while PENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SGHC: 5.4% · PENN: 8.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.