Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SGRP vs ABM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
SGRP vs ABM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $16M | $2.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147M | $8.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $158M |
| Gross Margin | 20.7% | 11.5% |
| Operating Margin | -11.7% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $104M |
SGRP vs ABM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
| ABM Industries Inco… (ABM) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGRP vs ABM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGRP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.05
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 77.9%, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 1.53x
ABM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 102.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 48.7% 10Y total return vs SGRP's -28.9%
- 4.6% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs SGRP's -14.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs ABM's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.0% vs SGRP's -34.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs SGRP's -35.0%, ROIC 7.5% vs -1.8% |
SGRP vs ABM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SGRP vs ABM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 60.3x SGRP's $147M. ABM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGRP's -14.7%. On growth, SGRP holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147M | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $327M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +11.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.7% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SGRP and ABM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ABM's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGRP's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.25x | 15.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.97x | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABM delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SGRP. SGRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABM's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABM scores 6/9 vs SGRP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -130.0% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $712,000 | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.80x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABM five years ago would be worth $8,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,113 for SGRP. Over the past 12 months, ABM leads with a -16.0% total return vs SGRP's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABM at 1.1% vs SGRP's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | -16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.4% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.9% | -14.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.2% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGRP and ABM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGRP is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABM's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABM currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs SGRP's 48.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.41 | $52.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $36.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.4% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 512K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ABM is the only dividend payer here at 2.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.1% | +5.1% |
ABM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SGRP vs ABM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGRP or ABM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the stronger pick with 4.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SGRP or ABM?
Over the past 5 years, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) delivered a total return of -14.
1%, compared to -58. 9% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABM returned +48. 7% versus SGRP's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SGRP or ABM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPAR Group, Inc.
(SGRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus ABM Industries Incorporated's 0. 72β — meaning ABM is approximately 1277% more volatile than SGRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 95% for ABM Industries Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SGRP or ABM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is pulling ahead at 4.
6% versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -181. 3% for SPAR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABM leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SGRP or ABM?
ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
9% net margin versus -9. 0% for SPAR Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABM leads at 3. 7% versus -2. 2% for SGRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGRP leads at 20. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SGRP or ABM?
In this comparison, ABM (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SGRP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SGRP or ABM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SPAR Group, Inc.
(SGRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGRP: -28. 9%, ABM: +48. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SGRP and ABM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock. ABM pays a dividend while SGRP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.