SHAK vs CAVA vs TXRH vs WING vs BROS

For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.

(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). Wingstop Inc. (WING) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (29. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Wingstop Inc.

(WING) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus CAVA Group, Inc. at 156. 5x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wingstop Inc. wins at 0. 57x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CAVA Group, Inc.

(CAVA) delivered a total return of +93. 1%, compared to -22. 6% for Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WING returned +514. 9% versus BROS's +46. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus CAVA Group, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning CAVA is approximately 162% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 163% for Shake Shack Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.

(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 9% for CAVA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Wingstop Inc.

(WING) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 0% net margin versus 3. 2% for Shake Shack Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WING leads at 27. 6% versus 5. 9% for SHAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WING leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Wingstop Inc. (WING) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 161. 5x for CAVA Group, Inc. — 136. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WING: 119. 1% to $295. 50.

In this comparison, TXRH (1.

7% yield), WING (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SHAK, CAVA, BROS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, BROS: +46. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WING is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock. TXRH, WING pay a dividend while SHAK, CAVA, BROS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.