Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $204M | $5.86B | $6.65B | $7.27B | $24.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $493M | $7.49B | $3.82B | $3.06B | $2.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $248M | $142M | $122M | $347M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 10.4% | 11.9% | 15.8% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 4.9% | 5.1% | 8.7% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.1x | 44.0x | 46.6x | 59.1x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $1.28B | $104M | $1.69B | $350M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $541M | $150M | $156M | $391M |
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shimmick Corporatio… (SHIM) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 355.8 | +255.8% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 343.5 | +243.5% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
| Sterling Infrastruc… (STRL) | 100 | 1277.6 | +1177.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHIM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.98 vs MYRG's 2.64
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 59.1x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.33
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.70
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 1.33x
ROAD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- Beta 1.50, current ratio 1.61x
- 54.2% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6%
- Beta 1.50 vs STRL's 2.54
STRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 176.9% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 16.8%
- 12.0% margin vs SHIM's -5.2%
- +351.7% vs ROAD's +46.1%
- 13.7% ROA vs SHIM's -11.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.2% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 59.1x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.0% margin vs SHIM's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.50 vs STRL's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +351.7% vs ROAD's +46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs SHIM's -11.8% |
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • ROAD leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • SHIM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 15.2x SHIM's $493M. STRL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHIM's -5.2%. On growth, STRL holds the edge at +91.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $493M | $7.5B | $3.8B | $3.1B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $437M | $261M | $430M | $575M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $248M | $142M | $122M | $347M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $165M | $231M | $187M | $440M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +10.4% | +11.9% | +15.8% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +8.7% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +4.0% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +2.2% | +6.0% | +6.1% | +15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -5.4% | +20.0% | +44.1% | +91.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.6% | -60.5% | +106.2% | +6.5% | +141.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 75% valuation discount to STRL's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs ROAD's 3.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $5.9B | $6.7B | $7.3B | $24.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $6.6B | $6.6B | $8.8B | $24.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.66x | 21.52x | 56.76x | 71.39x | 86.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.06x | 44.03x | 46.61x | 59.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x | 3.40x | 3.81x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.03x | 28.84x | 22.69x | 50.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.77x | 1.82x | 2.59x | 10.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.52x | 10.18x | 7.98x | 22.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.20x | 28.66x | 47.42x | 68.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MYRG and STRL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRL delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $13 for ROAD. MYRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs ROAD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +15.2% | +22.1% | +12.6% | +32.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +5.6% | +8.7% | +3.6% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +13.6% | +18.3% | +10.3% | +38.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -147.8% | +16.3% | +19.4% | +12.6% | +28.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.76x | 0.16x | 1.85x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $735M | -$47M | $1.5B | -$41M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $541M | $150M | $156M | $391M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $1.3B | $104M | $1.7B | $350M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.82x | 21.02x | 39.49x | 2.56x | 27.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRL five years ago would be worth $350,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,859 for SHIM. Over the past 12 months, STRL leads with a +351.7% total return vs ROAD's +46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRL at 167.8% vs SHIM's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.9% | -17.2% | +88.5% | +17.1% | +154.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +302.1% | +62.4% | +175.2% | +46.1% | +351.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +346.5% | +219.8% | +370.3% | +1819.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +234.4% | +417.6% | +324.4% | +3400.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +402.0% | +1680.8% | +985.6% | +17694.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +64.7% | +47.3% | +67.5% | +167.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ROAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRL's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROAD currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.83x | 1.70x | 1.50x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.76 | $205.50 | $475.39 | $141.90 | $888.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $65.23 | $152.10 | $88.88 | $171.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +52.6% | +89.9% | +92.6% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 30.3 | 80.7 | 65.5 | 88.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 1.1M | 306K | 489K | 498K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHIM as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", ROAD as "Buy", STRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -39.8% for STRL (target: $488). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $160.63 | $362.00 | $137.33 | $488.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 22 | 21 | 9 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.2% | +0.3% | +0.3% |
STRL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG vs ROAD vs STRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
Over the past 5 years, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) delivered a total return of +34. 0%, compared to -11. 4% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRL returned +176. 9% versus SHIM's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning STRL is approximately 69% more volatile than ROAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 13. 4% for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -5. 2% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRL leads at 16. 6% versus -3. 9% for SHIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRL leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 59. 1x for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SHIM, MYRG, ROAD, STRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG or ROAD or STRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, STRL: +176. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHIM and PRIM and MYRG and ROAD and STRL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHIM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.