Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $204M | $5.86B | $112.65B | $6.65B | $7.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $493M | $7.49B | $29.99B | $3.82B | $3.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $248M | $1.12B | $142M | $122M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 10.4% | 13.6% | 11.9% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 4.9% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.1x | 57.4x | 44.0x | 46.6x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $1.28B | $1.19B | $104M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $541M | $440M | $150M | $156M |
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shimmick Corporatio… (SHIM) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 355.8 | +255.8% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 398.7 | +298.7% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 343.5 | +243.5% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHIM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +302.1% vs ROAD's +46.1%
PRIM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs PWR's 3.33
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 46.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.49
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.1%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 16.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.30, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.14x
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 8.7% ROA vs SHIM's -11.8%
ROAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 54.2% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6%
- 4.0% margin vs SHIM's -5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.2% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 46.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs SHIM's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +302.1% vs ROAD's +46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SHIM's -11.8% |
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ROAD leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • SHIM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROAD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 60.9x SHIM's $493M. ROAD is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHIM's -5.2%. On growth, ROAD holds the edge at +44.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $493M | $7.5B | $30.0B | $3.8B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $437M | $2.4B | $261M | $430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $248M | $1.1B | $142M | $122M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $165M | $1.7B | $231M | $187M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +10.4% | +13.6% | +11.9% | +15.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +4.9% | +5.8% | +5.1% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +2.2% | +5.6% | +6.0% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -5.4% | +26.3% | +20.0% | +44.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.6% | -60.5% | +51.0% | +106.2% | +6.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $5.9B | $112.7B | $6.7B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $6.6B | $113.4B | $6.6B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.66x | 21.52x | 110.40x | 56.76x | 71.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.06x | 57.40x | 44.03x | 46.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x | 6.40x | 3.40x | 3.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.03x | 45.68x | 28.84x | 22.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.77x | 3.97x | 1.82x | 2.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.52x | 12.61x | 10.18x | 7.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.20x | 69.50x | 28.66x | 47.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $13 for ROAD. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +15.2% | +13.0% | +22.1% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +5.6% | +4.8% | +8.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +13.6% | +11.8% | +18.3% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -147.8% | +16.3% | +11.3% | +19.4% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.76x | 0.13x | 0.16x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $735M | $748M | -$47M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $541M | $440M | $150M | $156M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $104M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.82x | 21.02x | 6.27x | 39.49x | 2.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PWR and ROAD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,859 for SHIM. Over the past 12 months, SHIM leads with a +302.1% total return vs ROAD's +46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROAD at 67.5% vs SHIM's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.9% | -17.2% | +70.8% | +88.5% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +302.1% | +62.4% | +132.1% | +175.2% | +46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +346.5% | +345.2% | +219.8% | +370.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +234.4% | +651.1% | +417.6% | +324.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +402.0% | +3143.9% | +1680.8% | +985.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +64.7% | +64.5% | +47.3% | +67.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.83x | 1.30x | 1.70x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.76 | $205.50 | $788.72 | $475.39 | $141.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $65.23 | $315.45 | $152.10 | $88.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +52.6% | +95.2% | +89.9% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 30.3 | 87.0 | 80.7 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 1.1M | 1.1M | 306K | 489K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRIM and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHIM as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", ROAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $160.63 | $647.23 | $362.00 | $137.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 22 | 35 | 21 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | $0.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +1.2% | +0.3% |
ROAD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SHIM vs PRIM vs PWR vs MYRG vs ROAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -11. 4% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus SHIM's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 41% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
6% net margin versus -5. 2% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROAD leads at 8. 5% versus -3. 9% for SHIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROAD leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SHIM, PWR, MYRG, ROAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHIM or PRIM or PWR or MYRG or ROAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, SHIM: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHIM and PRIM and PWR and MYRG and ROAD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHIM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.