Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SILO vs PSTV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
SILO vs PSTV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72K | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-22M |
| Gross Margin | -8.1% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -74.5% | -293.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $821K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $9M |
SILO vs PSTV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Plus Therapeutics, … (PSTV) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SILO vs PSTV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SILO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.0%, EPS growth 0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 20.0% 10Y total return vs PSTV's -100.0%
- 0.0% revenue growth vs PSTV's -10.5%
PSTV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.82
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 1.23x
- Beta 1.82, current ratio 1.23x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.0% revenue growth vs PSTV's -10.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -429.4% margin vs SILO's -70.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.82 vs SILO's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -48.1% vs PSTV's -57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -79.5% ROA vs PSTV's -156.0% |
SILO vs PSTV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SILO vs PSTV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSTV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSTV is the larger business by revenue, generating $5M annually — 72.3x SILO's $72,102. PSTV is the more profitable business, keeping -4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SILO's -70.4%. On growth, SILO holds the edge at 0.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72,102 | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.5% | -2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.4% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.6% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSTV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $14M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $6M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | -0.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.12x | 2.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SILO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SILO delivers a -101.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-101 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PSTV. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSTV scores 4/9 vs SILO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.4% | -5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.5% | -156.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -186.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.0% | -3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $821,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1053.72x | -4.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SILO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SILO five years ago would be worth $16,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $73 for PSTV. Over the past 12 months, SILO leads with a -48.1% total return vs PSTV's -57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SILO at -42.6% vs PSTV's -61.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.0% | -57.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.1% | -57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | -94.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.7% | -99.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.0% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.6% | -61.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SILO and PSTV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSTV is the less volatile stock with a 1.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SILO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SILO currently trades 37.2% from its 52-week high vs PSTV's 25.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.13 | $23.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $0.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.2% | +25.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 355K |
Analyst Outlook
PSTV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | 0.0% |
PSTV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SILO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SILO vs PSTV: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — SILO or PSTV?
Over the past 5 years, Silo Pharma, Inc.
(SILO) delivered a total return of +64. 7%, compared to -99. 3% for Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (PSTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SILO returned +20. 0% versus PSTV's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — SILO or PSTV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plus Therapeutics, Inc.
(PSTV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 82β versus Silo Pharma, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning SILO is approximately 21% more volatile than PSTV relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — SILO or PSTV?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plus Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for Silo Pharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSTV leads at 185. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — SILO or PSTV?
Plus Therapeutics, Inc.
(PSTV) is the more profitable company, earning -429. 4% net margin versus -60. 9% for Silo Pharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps -429. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSTV leads at -293. 5% versus -65. 3% for SILO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SILO leads at 91. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SILO or PSTV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is SILO or PSTV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plus Therapeutics, Inc.
(PSTV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PSTV: -100. 0%, SILO: +20. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SILO and PSTV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.