Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $6M | $485M | $525M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-183M | $107M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | 42.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 4.3x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $697K | $1.35B | $199M |
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIM Acquisition Cor… (SIMAW) | 100 | 222.3 | +122.3% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIMAW is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 25.28x
- Lower P/E (1.3x vs 7.3x)
- +0.1% vs PSFE's -37.1%
PSFE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- -22.2% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.1% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.1% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC 41.0% vs 3.6% |
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and SIMAW operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, ACIC holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$951,211 | $371M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$183M | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $136M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | +42.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.0% | -183.3% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.3x trailing earnings, SIMAW trades at a 74% valuation discount to ACIC's 5.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIMAW's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSFE's 4.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $485M | $525M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $1.8B | $478M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.33x | -2.99x | 5.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x | 7.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.15x | 4.53x | 2.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.83x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x | 7.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. ACIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs SIMAW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -24.1% | +35.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -3.8% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% | +41.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,085 | $1.3B | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $697,085 | $1.3B | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x | 14.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, SIMAW leads with a +0.1% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 37.3% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +17.7% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | -37.1% | -0.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -34.9% | +159.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -94.2% | +107.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -92.1% | -22.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -13.3% | +37.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ACIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIC currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs SIMAW's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 2.35x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.60 | $16.49 | $13.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $5.95 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +56.9% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 65.3 | 31.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 361K | 188K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for PSFE (target: $10) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $1.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% | 0.0% |
ACIC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SIMAW vs PSFE vs ACIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger pick with 13.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). SIM Acquisition Corp. I (SIMAW) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
On trailing P/E, SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the cheapest at 1. 3x versus American Coastal Insurance Corporation at 5. 0x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACIC returned -22. 2% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 500% more volatile than ACIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is pulling ahead at 13.
1% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Coastal Insurance Corporation grew EPS 40. 5% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus 0. 0% for SIMAW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 7. 3x for American Coastal Insurance Corporation — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSFE: 6. 5% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SIMAW or PSFE or ACIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACIC: -22. 2%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIMAW and PSFE and ACIC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SIMAW (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SIMAW is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.