Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SITC vs COST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SITC
SITE Centers Corp.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$293M
5Y Perf.-75.4%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation

Discount Stores

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$448.58B
5Y Perf.+228.1%

SITC vs COST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SITC logoSITC
COST logoCOST
IndustryREIT - RetailDiscount Stores
Market Cap$293M$448.58B
Revenue (TTM)$90M$286.26B
Net Income (TTM)$176M$8.55B
Gross Margin-42.1%12.9%
Operating Margin-10.8%3.8%
Forward P/E1.6x49.5x
Total Debt$74M$8.17B
Cash & Equiv.$119M$14.16B

SITC vs COSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SITC
COST
StockMay 20May 26Return
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC)10024.6-75.4%
Costco Wholesale Co… (COST)100328.1+228.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SITC vs COST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SITC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Costco Wholesale Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SITC
SITE Centers Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 100.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 22.2%, current ratio 36.38x
  • PEG 0.05 vs COST's 3.28
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
The Growth Play

COST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
  • 6.2% 10Y total return vs SITC's -78.5%
  • 8.2% revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOST logoCOST8.2% revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
ValueSITC logoSITCLower P/E (1.6x vs 49.5x), PEG 0.05 vs 3.28
Quality / MarginsSITC logoSITC195.7% margin vs COST's 3.0%
Stability / SafetyCOST logoCOSTBeta 0.13 vs SITC's 1.05
DividendsSITC logoSITC100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COST's 0.5%
Momentum (1Y)SITC logoSITC+29.3% vs COST's +1.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SITC logoSITC32.2% ROA vs COST's 10.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 34.5%

SITC vs COST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SITCSITE Centers Corp.
FY 2025
Asset And Property Management Fees
98.0%$5M
Other
2.0%$100,000
COSTCostco Wholesale Corporation
FY 2025
Food and Sundries
39.8%$109.6B
Non-Foods
25.9%$71.2B
Other
18.6%$51.2B
Fresh Food
13.8%$38.0B
Membership
1.9%$5.3B

SITC vs COST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCOSTLAGGINGSITC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SITC and COST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

COST is the larger business by revenue, generating $286.3B annually — 3188.1x SITC's $90M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COST's 3.0%. On growth, COST holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$90M$286.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$28M$13.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$176M$8.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$133M$9.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-42.1%+12.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.8%+3.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+195.7%+3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+148.5%+3.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.3%+9.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.7%-2.1%
Evenly matched — SITC and COST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SITC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 97% valuation discount to COST's 55.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SITC offers better value at 0.05x vs COST's 3.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
Market CapShares × price$293M$448.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$248M$442.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.65x55.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.49.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.05x3.68x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.73x34.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.38x1.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.87x15.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.93x57.24x
SITC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

COST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SITC delivers a 48.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $29 for COST. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COST's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COST scores 7/9 vs SITC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+48.0%+28.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+32.2%+10.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%+34.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%+27.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$45M-$6.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$119M$14.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$8.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.60x77.52x
COST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

COST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in COST five years ago would be worth $27,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,170 for SITC. Over the past 12 months, SITC leads with a +29.3% total return vs COST's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COST at 27.8% vs SITC's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.8%+18.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.3%+1.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.2%+108.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.3%+172.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.5%+625.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.0%+27.8%
COST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

COST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

COST is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COST currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs SITC's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.05x0.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.10$1067.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.24$846.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.6%+94.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.647.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded777K1.7M
COST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SITC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SITC as "Hold" and COST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.4% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs 5.7% for COST (target: $1070). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs COST's 0.48%.

MetricSITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.COST logoCOSTCostco Wholesale …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$1070.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3158
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.78$4.91
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.2%
SITC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

COST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SITC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallCostco Wholesale Corporation (COST)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SITC vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SITC or COST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger pick with 8.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SITC or COST?

On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.

(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SITC or COST?

Over the past 5 years, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) delivered a total return of +172.

8%, compared to -68. 3% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +625. 0% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SITC or COST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

13β versus SITE Centers Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning SITC is approximately 723% more volatile than COST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 28% for Costco Wholesale Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SITC or COST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is pulling ahead at 8.

2% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Costco Wholesale Corporation grew EPS 10. 0% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COST leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SITC or COST?

SITE Centers Corp.

(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus 2. 9% for Costco Wholesale Corporation — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COST leads at 3. 8% versus -1. 3% for SITC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COST leads at 12. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SITC or COST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 43.

4% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SITC or COST?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).

09

Is SITC or COST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

13), +625. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COST: +625. 0%, SITC: -78. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SITC and COST?

These companies operate in different sectors (SITC (Real Estate) and COST (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SITC pays a dividend while COST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SITC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 117%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COST

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SITC and COST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SITC: -78.3% · COST: 9.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(SITC: 195.7% · COST: 3.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SITC: 1.6x · COST: 55.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.