Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.36B
5Y Perf.+13.8%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.56B
5Y Perf.+271.9%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.93B
5Y Perf.+242.2%
FERG
Ferguson plc

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$47.01B
5Y Perf.+204.7%
MAS
Masco Corporation

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.47B
5Y Perf.+53.8%

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SITE logoSITE
BLDR logoBLDR
IBP logoIBP
FERG logoFERG
MAS logoMAS
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionConstructionResidential ConstructionIndustrial - DistributionConstruction
Market Cap$5.36B$8.56B$5.93B$47.01B$14.47B
Revenue (TTM)$4.71B$14.82B$2.95B$31.63B$7.68B
Net Income (TTM)$153M$292M$255M$2.07B$837M
Gross Margin34.9%29.9%33.9%30.7%35.4%
Operating Margin5.1%4.2%12.7%9.2%16.8%
Forward P/E27.9x18.0x19.9x21.5x16.8x
Total Debt$980M$5.65B$1.05B$5.97B$3.44B
Cash & Equiv.$191M$182M$322M$674M$647M

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SITE
BLDR
IBP
FERG
MAS
StockMay 20May 26Return
SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE)100113.8+13.8%
Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR)100371.9+271.9%
Installed Building … (IBP)100342.2+242.2%
Ferguson plc (FERG)100304.7+204.7%
Masco Corporation (MAS)100153.8+53.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MAS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Ferguson plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SITE and IBP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play

SITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 58.2%, current ratio 2.47x
  • Beta 1.15 vs BLDR's 1.66, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 6.6% 10Y total return vs FERG's 364.3%
  • PEG 0.82 vs SITE's 6.72
  • Beta 1.31, yield 1.5%, current ratio 3.03x
  • Lower P/E (19.9x vs 21.5x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.26
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
FERG
Ferguson plc
The Growth Leader

FERG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
  • +43.1% vs BLDR's -30.3%
Best for: growth and momentum
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Income Pick

MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
  • 10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
  • 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFERG logoFERG3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
ValueIBP logoIBPLower P/E (19.9x vs 21.5x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.26
Quality / MarginsMAS logoMAS10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Stability / SafetySITE logoSITEBeta 1.15 vs BLDR's 1.66, lower leverage
DividendsMAS logoMAS1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FERG logoFERG+43.1% vs BLDR's -30.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MAS logoMAS15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4%

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscaping Products
76.9%$3.6B
Agronomic
23.1%$1.1B
BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Building Products And Services
26.8%$4.1B
Lumber And Lumber Sheet Goods
25.5%$3.9B
Windows Doors And Millwork
25.3%$3.8B
Manufactured Products
22.5%$3.4B
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Installation
50.0%$2.8B
Insulation
30.9%$1.7B
Shower Doors Shelving And Mirrors
4.0%$219M
Other Building Products
3.3%$184M
Garage Doors
3.1%$173M
Waterproofing
2.9%$161M
Rain Gutters
2.3%$125M
Other (2)
3.5%$193M
FERGFerguson plc
FY 2025
United States Segment
100.0%$29.3B
MASMasco Corporation
FY 2025
Plumbing Products
66.0%$5.0B
Decorative Architectural Products
34.0%$2.6B

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMASLAGGINGFERG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.7x IBP's $2.9B. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, MAS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.7B$14.8B$2.9B$31.6B$7.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$382M$1.2B$656M$3.3B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$153M$292M$255M$2.1B$837M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$246M$862M$63M$1.0B$943M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.9%+29.9%+33.9%+30.7%+35.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.1%+4.2%+12.7%+9.2%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%+2.0%+8.6%+6.6%+10.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.2%+5.8%+2.1%+3.2%+12.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.1%-10.1%-3.5%-2.0%+6.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%-151.2%-21.3%+2.9%+20.7%
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 18.6x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 48% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.93x vs SITE's 8.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
Market CapShares × price$5.4B$8.6B$5.9B$47.0B$14.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.2B$14.0B$6.7B$52.3B$17.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS35.91x19.90x22.66x25.89x18.59x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.89x18.03x19.88x21.49x16.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.65x2.52x0.93x1.52x3.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.23x10.18x13.58x17.56x12.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.14x0.56x1.99x1.53x1.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.24x1.99x8.38x8.24x200.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.72x10.03x19.70x29.33x16.71x
BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. SITE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.1%+6.9%+37.5%+35.1%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.6%+2.6%+12.2%+11.8%+15.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.3%+6.4%+20.7%+18.0%+35.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+8.5%+22.6%+22.6%+35.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985866
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.58x1.30x1.48x1.02x45.81x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$789M$5.5B$731M$5.3B$2.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$191M$182M$322M$674M$647M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$980M$5.6B$1.1B$6.0B$3.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.79x2.19x9.47x15.59x12.60x
MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FERG five years ago would be worth $19,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,008 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, FERG leads with a +43.1% total return vs BLDR's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 26.2% vs BLDR's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.2%-26.0%-16.9%+8.0%+11.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-0.3%-30.3%+37.3%+43.1%+18.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-21.3%-31.9%+101.1%+78.3%+39.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.9%+48.0%+81.7%+93.4%+15.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+353.7%+596.0%+660.5%+364.3%+151.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.7%-12.0%+26.2%+21.3%+11.8%
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SITE and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SITE is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.15x1.66x1.31x1.19x1.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$168.56$151.03$349.00$271.64$79.19
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$112.23$73.40$150.83$169.11$58.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.8%+51.2%+63.0%+88.8%+90.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.742.028.942.959.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded690K2.4M345K1.3M2.7M
Evenly matched — SITE and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SITE as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", FERG as "Buy", MAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for BLDR (target: $107) vs 13.8% for FERG (target: $275). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs FERG's 1.02%.

MetricSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcMAS logoMASMasco Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$162.29$106.64$251.33$274.63$82.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts1543271438
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+1.0%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises225012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.24$2.45$1.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.8%+4.8%+2.9%+2.0%+3.9%
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMasco Corporation (MAS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SITE vs BLDR vs IBP vs FERG vs MAS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.

6x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

Over the past 5 years, Ferguson plc (FERG) delivered a total return of +93.

4%, compared to -39. 9% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus MAS's +151. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning BLDR is approximately 44% more volatile than SITE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

7% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAS leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 9x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 37. 8% to $106. 64.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS?

In this comparison, MAS (1.

7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SITE, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SITE or BLDR or IBP or FERG or MAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +660. 5% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +660. 5%, BLDR: +596. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SITE and BLDR and IBP and FERG and MAS?

These companies operate in different sectors (SITE (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and FERG (Industrials) and MAS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

IBP, FERG, MAS pay a dividend while SITE, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SITE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLDR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FERG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SITE and BLDR and IBP and FERG and MAS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SITE: 0.1% · BLDR: -10.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SITE: 35.9x · BLDR: 19.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.