Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Residential Construction
Construction
Financial - Credit Services
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Residential Construction | Construction | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.42B | $6.90B | $8.06B | $8.85B | $26.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.71B | $5.36B | $2.97B | $14.82B | $19.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $153M | $406M | $265M | $292M | $3.60B |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 29.7% | 34.0% | 29.9% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | 10.9% | 13.0% | 4.2% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 17.0x | 26.9x | 14.2x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $980M | $349M | $1.05B | $5.65B | $15.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $191M | $105M | $322M | $182M | $14.97B |
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Pool Corporation (POOL) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 465.4 | +365.4% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 384.6 | +284.6% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 368.9 | +268.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9%
POOL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 29.4%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 1.00, yield 2.6%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
IBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.4%
- +82.7% vs POOL's -34.7%
- 13.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SYF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs SITE's 6.76
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.25 vs 1.79
- 18.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.25 vs 1.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs POOL's -34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4% |
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBP leads 2 • POOL leads 1 • SITE leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYF is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.1B annually — 6.4x IBP's $3.0B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, POOL holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $5.4B | $3.0B | $14.8B | $19.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $382M | $636M | $704M | $1.2B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $153M | $406M | $265M | $292M | $3.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $246M | $605M | $49M | $862M | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +29.7% | +34.0% | +29.9% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +10.9% | +13.0% | +4.2% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +7.6% | +8.9% | +2.0% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +11.3% | +1.7% | +5.8% | +51.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | +6.2% | -0.4% | -10.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +2.1% | +18.4% | -151.2% | +20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SYF leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SYF trades at a 78% valuation discount to SITE's 36.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.25x vs SITE's 8.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $6.9B | $8.1B | $8.9B | $26.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $7.1B | $8.8B | $14.3B | $26.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.27x | 17.33x | 30.81x | 20.57x | 8.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.04x | 16.99x | 26.91x | 14.17x | 8.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.74x | 4.47x | 1.27x | 2.60x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.38x | 11.31x | 17.93x | 10.39x | 5.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 1.30x | 2.71x | 0.58x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.27x | 5.91x | 11.40x | 2.06x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.94x | 22.29x | 26.79x | 10.37x | 2.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 39.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. POOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +32.2% | +39.1% | +6.9% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +11.3% | +13.0% | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +22.3% | +20.7% | +6.4% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +22.0% | +22.6% | +8.5% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.29x | 1.48x | 1.30x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $789M | $244M | $731M | $5.5B | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $191M | $105M | $322M | $182M | $15.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $980M | $349M | $1.1B | $5.6B | $15.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.79x | 12.20x | 12.26x | 2.19x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $22,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,815 for POOL. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +82.7% total return vs POOL's -34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 42.0% vs POOL's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | -17.6% | +12.7% | -23.5% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | -34.7% | +82.7% | -25.3% | +43.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | -42.8% | +170.4% | -29.6% | +186.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.8% | -51.8% | +126.8% | +53.9% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +358.3% | +146.4% | +894.2% | +636.9% | +179.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | -17.0% | +39.3% | -11.0% | +42.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POOL and IBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBP currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.00x | 1.19x | 1.65x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $168.56 | $345.00 | $349.00 | $151.03 | $88.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $112.23 | $186.95 | $150.83 | $73.40 | $52.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +54.5% | +85.7% | +53.0% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 28.7 | 45.7 | 31.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 697K | 752K | 319K | 2.4M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SITE as "Buy", POOL as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy", SYF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs -2.0% for IBP (target: $293). For income investors, POOL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs IBP's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $162.29 | $279.29 | $293.00 | $109.92 | $90.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 21 | 27 | 43 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.1% | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.96 | $3.24 | — | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +5.0% | +2.1% | +4.7% | +11.3% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IBP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SITE vs POOL vs IBP vs BLDR vs SYF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +126. 8%, compared to -51. 8% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +894. 2% versus POOL's +146. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 65% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pool Corporation (POOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYF leads at 24. 2% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SYF leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 48. 6% to $279. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF?
In this comparison, POOL (2.
6% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield), IBP (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SITE, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SITE or POOL or IBP or BLDR or SYF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 1% yield, +894. 2% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +894. 2%, BLDR: +636. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SITE and POOL and IBP and BLDR and SYF?
These companies operate in different sectors (SITE (Industrials) and POOL (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials) and SYF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. POOL, IBP, SYF pay a dividend while SITE, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.