Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
Entertainment
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $47M | $142M | $2.16B | $481M | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $4.20B | $10.29B | $6.11B | $27.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-587M | $-202M | $800M | $-153M | $-390M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 9.2% | 37.7% | 12.7% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -7.1% | 12.7% | -3.4% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 1.1x | 4.0x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $16M | $129M | $49M | $14.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $308M | $1.02B | $5.44B | $1.19B | $3.53B |
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scienjoy Holding Co… (SJ) | 100 | 16.2 | -83.8% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 7.3 | -92.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.04 vs IQ's 1.43, lower leverage
DOYU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth -17.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- -9.4% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- -5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +26.9% vs IQ's -36.0%
Among these 5 stocks, IQ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs IQ's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs IQ's -36.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs SJ's -62.6%, ROIC 10.9% vs -9.6% |
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOYU leads 1 • SJ leads 0 • HUYA leads 0 • IQ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.1B annually — 21.5x SJ's $1.3B. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJ's -46.4%. On growth, DOYU holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $4.2B | $10.3B | $6.1B | $27.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$104M | -$275M | $1.4B | -$120M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$587M | -$202M | $800M | -$153M | -$390M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $685M | $0 | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +9.2% | +37.7% | +12.7% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -7.1% | +12.7% | -3.4% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.4% | -4.8% | +7.8% | -2.5% | -1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -5.9% | +6.7% | -1.9% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +2.1% | -5.1% | +1.7% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.0% | +179.1% | +32.1% | -118.5% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DOYU and MOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 13% valuation discount to IQ's 10.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQ's 10.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $142M | $2.2B | $481M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | -$5M | $1.4B | $314M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | -3.31x | 9.34x | -103.70x | 10.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.28x | 1.08x | 3.97x | 4.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 6.91x | — | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.23x | 1.46x | 0.54x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 0.23x | 0.66x | 0.67x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.56x | — | 21.90x | — | 4.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-75 for SJ. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.7% | -6.5% | +7.2% | -2.4% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.6% | -4.7% | +5.3% | -1.7% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | -15.4% | +10.9% | -1.7% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -10.3% | +10.8% | -2.1% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$294M | -$1.0B | -$5.3B | -$1.1B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $308M | $1.0B | $5.4B | $1.2B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $16M | $129M | $49M | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 18.04x | — | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DOYU and MOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.1% | -31.8% | +1.6% | +5.6% | -40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | -34.2% | +16.2% | +26.9% | -36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | +125.5% | -5.7% | +99.7% | -79.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | -71.6% | -36.7% | -60.8% | -91.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -78.8% | -9.4% | -60.1% | -92.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.8% | +31.1% | -1.9% | +25.9% | -41.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQ's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.10x | 0.78x | 1.17x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $9.34 | $9.22 | $4.93 | $2.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $4.28 | $5.68 | $2.21 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +50.3% | +68.8% | +64.9% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 47.0 | 61.2 | 54.2 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 26K | 648K | 1.0M | 11.1M |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOYU as "Hold", MOMO as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", IQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MOMO's 4.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.03 | $8.10 | $3.45 | $2.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 16 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +4.6% | +56.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $68.16 | $1.99 | $12.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.9% | +5.1% | +7.6% | 0.0% |
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOYU leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
SJ vs DOYU vs MOMO vs HUYA vs IQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger pick with -5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus iQIYI, Inc. at 10. 7x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9. 4% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus iQIYI, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning IQ is approximately 3176% more volatile than SJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is pulling ahead at -5. 9% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1572. 7% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQ leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -47. 3% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for iQIYI, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SJ, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SJ or DOYU or MOMO or HUYA or IQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SJ: -88. 8%, IQ: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SJ and DOYU and MOMO and HUYA and IQ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. DOYU, MOMO, HUYA pay a dividend while SJ, IQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.