Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corporation

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$47M
5Y Perf.-83.8%
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.-67.3%
LIVE
Live Ventures Incorporated

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$40M
5Y Perf.+24.8%
HUYA
HUYA Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$481M
5Y Perf.-79.4%
DOYU
DouYu International Holdings Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$142M
5Y Perf.-94.8%

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SJ logoSJ
MOMO logoMOMO
LIVE logoLIVE
HUYA logoHUYA
DOYU logoDOYU
IndustryBroadcastingInternet Content & InformationHome ImprovementEntertainmentInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$47M$2.16B$40M$481M$142M
Revenue (TTM)$1.26B$10.29B$442M$6.11B$4.20B
Net Income (TTM)$-587M$800M$22M$-153M$-202M
Gross Margin18.3%37.7%33.0%12.7%9.2%
Operating Margin-6.2%12.7%3.9%-3.4%-7.1%
Forward P/E1.1x2.7x4.0x4.3x
Total Debt$14M$129M$216M$49M$16M
Cash & Equiv.$308M$5.44B$9M$1.19B$1.02B

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SJ
MOMO
LIVE
HUYA
DOYU
StockMay 20May 26Return
Scienjoy Holding Co… (SJ)10016.2-83.8%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)10032.7-67.3%
Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE)100124.8+24.8%
HUYA Inc. (HUYA)10020.6-79.4%
DouYu International… (DOYU)1005.2-94.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MOMO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Scienjoy Holding Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. LIVE, HUYA, and DOYU also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corporation
The Defensive Choice

SJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.04 vs LIVE's 1.23, lower leverage
Best for: stability
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • -9.4% 10Y total return vs LIVE's 33.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
  • -5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
  • Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.3x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
LIVE
Live Ventures Incorporated
The Growth Play

LIVE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth 158.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
  • 5.7% ROA vs SJ's -62.6%, ROIC 3.5% vs -9.6%
Best for: growth exposure
HUYA
HUYA Inc.
The Momentum Pick

HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +26.9% vs DOYU's -34.2%
Best for: momentum
DOYU
DouYu International Holdings Limited
The Income Pick

DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
  • 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMOMO logoMOMO-5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
ValueMOMO logoMOMOLower P/E (1.1x vs 4.3x)
Quality / MarginsMOMO logoMOMO7.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4%
Stability / SafetySJ logoSJBeta 0.04 vs LIVE's 1.23, lower leverage
DividendsDOYU logoDOYU100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HUYA logoHUYA+26.9% vs DOYU's -34.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LIVE logoLIVE5.7% ROA vs SJ's -62.6%, ROIC 3.5% vs -9.6%

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SJScienjoy Holding Corporation
FY 2025
Technology Service
100.0%$38M
MOMOHello Group Inc.
FY 2024
Live Video Service
49.5%$4.8B
Value-added Services
49.4%$4.8B
Mobile Marketing
1.1%$105M
Other Services
0.0%$3M
Mobile Games
0.0%$432,000
LIVELive Ventures Incorporated
FY 2023
Flooring Manufacturing
54.6%$110M
Steel Manufacturing
44.2%$89M
Corporate and Other
1.2%$2M
HUYAHUYA Inc.
FY 2024
Revenue Sharing Fees And Content Costs
95.1%$4.6B
Bandwidth Costs
4.9%$237M
DOYUDouYu International Holdings Limited
FY 2024
Revenue sharing fees and content costs
85.2%$3.4B
Bandwidth costs
7.7%$305M
Other costs
7.1%$279M

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMOMOLAGGINGHUYA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 23.3x LIVE's $442M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJ's -46.4%. On growth, DOYU holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$10.3B$442M$6.1B$4.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$104M$1.4B$29M-$120M-$275M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$587M$800M$22M-$153M-$202M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$685M$22M$0$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.3%+37.7%+33.0%+12.7%+9.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.2%+12.7%+3.9%-3.4%-7.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-46.4%+7.8%+5.0%-2.5%-4.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.6%+6.7%+5.0%-1.9%-5.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.5%-5.1%-2.7%+1.7%+2.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.0%+32.1%-112.5%-118.5%+179.1%
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MOMO and LIVE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.7x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 71% valuation discount to MOMO's 9.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIVE's 7.8x.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
Market CapShares × price$47M$2.2B$40M$481M$142M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$1.4B$248M$314M-$5M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.53x9.34x2.67x-103.70x-3.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.08x3.97x4.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.91x7.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.26x1.46x0.09x0.54x0.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.53x0.66x0.60x0.67x0.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.56x21.90x1.93x
Evenly matched — MOMO and LIVE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MOMO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-75 for SJ. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-74.7%+7.2%+23.3%-2.4%-6.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-62.6%+5.3%+5.7%-1.7%-4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.6%+10.9%+3.5%-1.7%-15.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.5%+10.8%+5.3%-2.1%-10.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957773
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.01x2.27x0.01x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$294M-$5.3B$208M-$1.1B-$1.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$308M$5.4B$9M$1.2B$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$129M$216M$49M$16M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense18.04x5.01x
MOMO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,249 for SJ. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs DOYU's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs SJ's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.1%+1.6%-16.2%+5.6%-31.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.3%+16.2%-9.2%+26.9%-34.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.5%-5.7%-56.1%+99.7%+125.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.5%-36.7%-64.9%-60.8%-71.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-9.4%+33.0%-60.1%-78.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.8%-1.9%-24.0%+25.9%+31.1%
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIVE's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs DOYU's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.04x0.78x1.23x1.17x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.63$9.22$25.88$4.93$9.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$5.68$7.01$2.21$4.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.5%+68.8%+50.9%+64.9%+50.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.361.242.254.247.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded40K648K5K1.0M26K
Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MOMO as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MOMO's 4.61%.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.LIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.DOYU logoDOYUDouYu Internation…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.10$3.45$9.03
# AnalystsCovering analysts16157
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.6%+56.7%+100.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00112
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.99$12.34$68.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.1%+1.3%+7.6%+10.9%
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOYU leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallHello Group Inc. (MOMO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SJ vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the stronger pick with -5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.

7x versus Hello Group Inc. at 9. 3x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -87. 5% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIVE returned +33. 0% versus SJ's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Live Ventures Incorporated's 1. 23β — meaning LIVE is approximately 2728% more volatile than SJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is pulling ahead at -5. 9% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1572. 7% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -47. 3% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?

In this comparison, DOYU (100.

0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SJ, LIVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SJ or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SJ: -88. 8%, LIVE: +33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SJ and MOMO and LIVE and HUYA and DOYU?

These companies operate in different sectors (SJ (Communication Services) and MOMO (Communication Services) and LIVE (Consumer Cyclical) and HUYA (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MOMO, HUYA, DOYU pay a dividend while SJ, LIVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SJ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MOMO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 22.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DOYU

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SJ and MOMO and LIVE and HUYA and DOYU on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SJ: -3.5% · MOMO: -5.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.