Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Financial - Capital Markets
Chemicals - Specialty
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Financial - Capital Markets | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $7M | $4M | $1.27B | $580M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $87M | $1.94B | $164M | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $727K | $-25M | $-15M | $137M | $50M |
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | -8.6% | 1.8% | 61.9% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | -26.1% | 1.2% | 16.8% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 29.5x | 9.0x | 64.1x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $3M | $508M | $14M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $719K | $391K | $182M | $95M | $196M |
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skyline Builders Gr… (SKBL) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| CN Energy Group. In… (CNEY) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 203.7 | +103.7% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 238.2 | +138.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKBL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CNEY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GPRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15
- +373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 64.1x)
- 17.3% margin vs CNEY's -29.1%
REX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 476.3% 10Y total return vs GPRE's 32.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.28 vs BTBT's 3.41
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 64.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CNEY's -29.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs BTBT's 3.41 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs CNEY's -23.5%, ROIC 6.5% vs -8.2% |
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
REX leads 1 • SKBL leads 0 • CNEY leads 0 • GPRE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 42.1x SKBL's $46M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNEY's -29.1%. On growth, REX holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $87M | $1.9B | $164M | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$19M | $122M | $166M | $67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25M | -$15M | $137M | $50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$4M | $90M | -$448M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | -8.6% | +1.8% | +61.9% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -26.1% | +1.2% | +16.8% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -29.1% | -0.8% | +17.3% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | -4.7% | +4.7% | -65.3% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% | -25.9% | — | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +94.2% | +134.2% | +2.8% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNEY and GPRE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 70% valuation discount to REX's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKBL's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 112.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $4M | $1.3B | $580M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $7M | $1.6B | $498M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.04x | -10.11x | 9.00x | 30.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 29.48x | — | 64.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | — | 112.32x | 8.32x | 16.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.12x | 0.61x | 3.54x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 0.00x | 1.59x | 0.55x | 2.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.71x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-25 for CNEY. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKBL's 1.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CNEY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | -24.9% | -2.0% | +21.4% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -23.5% | -1.0% | +19.0% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | -8.2% | -5.2% | +6.5% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.8% | -11.0% | -6.2% | +8.5% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 0.03x | 0.66x | 0.03x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $3M | $326M | -$81M | -$175M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $718,625 | $390,706 | $182M | $95M | $196M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $3M | $508M | $14M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | -29.77x | -0.08x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $38,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $58 for CNEY. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +373.7% total return vs CNEY's -84.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 51.8% vs CNEY's -50.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +19.8% | +76.9% | -11.8% | +53.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.0% | -84.1% | +373.7% | -13.5% | +145.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | -87.5% | -41.2% | -21.1% | +250.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | -99.4% | -39.3% | -82.8% | +290.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | -99.6% | +32.9% | -61.0% | +476.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | -50.0% | -16.2% | -7.6% | +51.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPRE and REX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REX is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRE currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs CNEY's 10.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.44x | 1.15x | 3.41x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.25 | $7.36 | $18.94 | $4.55 | $53.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $0.31 | $3.39 | $1.25 | $19.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.2% | +10.3% | +96.0% | +39.6% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 53.8 | 49.9 | 62.2 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 236K | 634K | 1.5M | 18.6M | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GPRE as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", REX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 177.8% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -9.3% for GPRE (target: $17). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.50 | $5.00 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 20 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). REX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SKBL vs CNEY vs GPRE vs BTBT vs REX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Green Plains Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +290.
0%, compared to -99. 4% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +476. 3% versus CNEY's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
28β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 1124% more volatile than REX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 142% for Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNEY leads at -4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -31. 3% for CN Energy Group. Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -30. 9% for CNEY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Green Plains Inc.
(GPRE) trades at 29. 5x forward P/E versus 64. 1x for REX American Resources Corporation — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 177. 8% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SKBL, CNEY, GPRE, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKBL or CNEY or GPRE or BTBT or REX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), +476. 3% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REX: +476. 3%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKBL and CNEY and GPRE and BTBT and REX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKBL (Industrials) and CNEY (Basic Materials) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and REX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKBL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNEY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.