Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Other Precious Metals
Silver
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals | Silver |
| Market Cap | $3.66B | $1.18B | $2.99B | $24.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $330M | $4.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-114M | $-16M | $-94M | $1.27B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 9.3% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -1.7% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.2x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $0.00 | $120M | $935M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $133M | $106M | $1.21B |
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skeena Resources Li… (SKE) | 100 | 291.0 | +191.0% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 186.4 | +86.4% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 275.7 | +175.7% |
| Pan American Silver… (PAAS) | 100 | 272.9 | +172.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.3% 10Y total return vs PAAS's 326.1%
- Beta 0.67 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage
VZLA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +193.4% vs VZLA's +51.1%
PAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 30.6%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.6% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.4% vs VZLA's +51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.0% ROA vs SKE's -17.7%, ROIC 15.7% vs -357.8% |
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAAS leads in 4 of 6 categories
SKE leads 1 • VZLA leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAAS and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. PAAS is the more profitable business, keeping 31.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $330M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$77M | -$34M | $49M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$114M | -$16M | -$94M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$285M | -$45M | -$129M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +9.3% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -1.7% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -28.4% | +31.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -39.1% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +154.0% | +49.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | +11.9% | -97.5% | +134.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PAAS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PAAS's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $1.2B | $3.0B | $24.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $1.1B | $3.0B | $24.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.98x | -159.19x | -78.08x | 22.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.18x | 12.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 76.02x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 13.72x | 6.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 45.15x | 3.06x | 5.07x | 3.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 22.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAAS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAAS delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-134 for SKE. PAAS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAAS scores 7/9 vs SKE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -134.1% | -3.1% | -18.4% | +19.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.7% | -3.1% | -9.2% | +14.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | -7.2% | +1.5% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.1% | -7.2% | +1.6% | +15.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | — | 0.25x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$83M | -$133M | $14M | -$277M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $133M | $106M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $0 | $120M | $935M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -49.83x | — | -39.17x | 23.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKE five years ago would be worth $27,203 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,057 for VZLA. Over the past 12 months, EXK leads with a +193.4% total return vs VZLA's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKE at 61.6% vs VZLA's 32.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | -37.9% | +12.5% | +13.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.3% | +51.1% | +193.4% | +137.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.9% | +134.9% | +144.0% | +229.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.0% | +40.6% | +61.1% | +71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1028.7% | +40.6% | +182.7% | +326.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.6% | +32.9% | +34.6% | +48.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKE and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAAS currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.47x | 1.80x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.77 | $7.19 | $15.15 | $69.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.92 | $2.23 | $3.14 | $22.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +47.7% | +67.0% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 51.3 | 47.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 767K | 7.5M | 9.4M | 6.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PAAS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKE as "Buy", VZLA as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", PAAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for VZLA (target: $7) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13). PAAS is the only dividend payer here at 0.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $12.75 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 | 14 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
PAAS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SKE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SKE vs VZLA vs EXK vs PAAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the stronger pick with 30. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Skeena Resources Limited (SKE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
On forward P/E, Pan American Silver Corp.
is actually cheaper at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
Over the past 5 years, Skeena Resources Limited (SKE) delivered a total return of +172.
0%, compared to +40. 6% for Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKE returned +1087% versus VZLA's +45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skeena Resources Limited (SKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 80β — meaning EXK is approximately 108% more volatile than SKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is pulling ahead at 30. 6% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAAS leads at 35. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAAS leads at 32. 3% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAAS leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Endeavour Silver Corp. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZLA: 104. 1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS?
In this comparison, PAAS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SKE, VZLA, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKE or VZLA or EXK or PAAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skeena Resources Limited (SKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), +1087% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKE: +1087%, EXK: +179. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKE and VZLA and EXK and PAAS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS pays a dividend while SKE, VZLA, EXK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.