REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.16B | $150.37B | $65.73B | $24.56B | $57.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $582M | $11.63B | $6.36B | $3.12B | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $1.43B | $4.61B | $954M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | 39.1% | 85.7% | 46.3% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 4.4% | 49.9% | 28.5% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 34.3x | 79.6x | 30.4x | 47.7x | 37.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.69B | $21.38B | $29.94B | $8.78B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $5.03B | $823M | $56M | $435M |
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 100 | 591.2 | +491.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 423.6 | +323.6% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 350.3 | +250.3% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.6 | +15.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 225.2% 10Y total return vs O's 45.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EQR's 4.1%
SPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.96 vs EQR's 9.36
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 47.7x), PEG 0.96 vs 9.36
- 72.5% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
- 11.4% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.8%
Among these 5 stocks, EQR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
O ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 5.2%
- Beta 0.11, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.11 vs SKT's 0.67, lower leverage
- 5.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs SKT's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EQR's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 47.7x), PEG 0.96 vs 9.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs SKT's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs SKT's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs EQR's -2.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.8% |
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories
WELL leads 1 • O leads 1 • SKT leads 0 • EQR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 20.0x SKT's $582M. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $582M | $11.6B | $6.4B | $3.1B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | $2.8B | $4.7B | $1.9B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | $1.4B | $4.6B | $954M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $212M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.9% | +39.1% | +85.7% | +46.3% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +4.4% | +49.9% | +28.5% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +12.3% | +72.5% | +30.6% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +21.9% | +35.4% | +42.7% | +68.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +40.3% | +13.2% | +2.5% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +22.5% | +3.6% | -64.2% | +17.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SPG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 91% valuation discount to WELL's 154.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPG offers better value at 0.45x vs O's 72.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $150.4B | $65.7B | $24.6B | $57.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $166.7B | $94.9B | $33.3B | $90.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.36x | 154.41x | 14.29x | 22.52x | 52.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.31x | 79.65x | 30.39x | 47.69x | 37.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | 4.42x | 72.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.88x | 66.86x | 20.36x | 15.55x | 21.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.16x | 14.10x | 10.33x | 7.92x | 10.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.67x | 3.38x | 9.83x | 2.23x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.56x | 52.80x | — | 19.04x | 14.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $3 for O. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs SKT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +3.5% | +68.8% | +8.4% | +2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +2.3% | +11.4% | +4.6% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +0.5% | +7.6% | +4.2% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | +0.6% | +9.1% | +5.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.30x | 0.49x | 4.47x | 0.77x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $16.3B | $29.1B | $8.7B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $5.0B | $823M | $56M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $21.4B | $29.9B | $8.8B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.81x | 0.26x | 3.26x | 5.58x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,546 for EQR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +46.7% total return vs EQR's -2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.9% vs O's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +15.2% | +11.1% | +7.9% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.8% | +46.7% | +29.3% | -2.0% | +15.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +191.6% | +109.8% | +17.0% | +13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.3% | +206.1% | +89.2% | +5.5% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +225.2% | +29.3% | +28.9% | +45.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.7% | +42.9% | +28.0% | +5.4% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
O is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKT's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs O's 91.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.15x | 0.61x | 0.37x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.95 | $219.59 | $208.28 | $71.80 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.69 | $142.65 | $155.44 | $57.58 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +97.7% | +97.0% | +91.3% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 54.5 | 52.9 | 67.3 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 725K | 2.6M | 1.4M | 2.4M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
O leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKT as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", SPG as "Hold", EQR as "Hold", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.7% upside for WELL (target: $233) vs -2.5% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, O offers the higher dividend yield at 5.21% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.67 | $233.25 | $197.00 | $70.61 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 34 | 37 | 46 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +1.3% | — | +4.1% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.15 | $2.76 | — | $2.69 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SKT vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Equity Residential (EQR). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 4x. On forward P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Simon Property Group, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +206. 1%, compared to +5. 5% for Equity Residential (EQR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +225. 2% versus EQR's +28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Realty Income Corporation (O) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Tanger Inc. 's 0. 67β — meaning SKT is approximately 486% more volatile than O relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 4. 1% for Equity Residential (EQR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 79. 6x for Welltower Inc. — 49. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 8. 7% to $233. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O?
In this comparison, O (5.
2% yield), EQR (4. 1% yield), SKT (3. 2% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKT or WELL or SPG or EQR or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 3% yield, +225. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +225. 2%, SPG: +29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKT and WELL and SPG and EQR and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SKT, WELL, EQR, O pay a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.