Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $32M | $358.42B | $150.63B | $14.24B | $28.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $61.16B | $63.31B | $4.44B | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $4.23B | $7.49B | $29M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.2% | 69.3% | 66.9% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 26.7% | 23.4% | 13.9% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 8.9x | 9.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $274K | $69.07B | $67.42B | $5.42B | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $5.23B | $1.14B | $1.39B | $3.01B |
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skye Bioscience, In… (SKYE) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 228.0 | +128.0% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.8 | -26.2% |
| Jazz Pharmaceutical… (JAZZ) | 100 | 170.1 | +70.1% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SKYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs JAZZ's 53.7%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs SKYE's -112.9%
- Beta 0.34 vs SKYE's 2.36
PFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 13.0x)
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JAZZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +123.7% vs SKYE's -50.6%
BIIB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- 13.9% margin vs JAZZ's 0.7%
- 4.7% ROA vs SKYE's -119.9%, ROIC 6.5% vs -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs SKYE's -112.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs JAZZ's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs SKYE's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs SKYE's -50.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SKYE's -119.9%, ROIC 6.5% vs -6.0% |
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ABBV leads 1 • JAZZ leads 1 • SKYE leads 0 • BIIB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and SKYE operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. BIIB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JAZZ's 0.7%. On growth, JAZZ holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $61.2B | $63.3B | $4.4B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $24.5B | $21.0B | $994M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $4.2B | $7.5B | $29M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.2B | $18.7B | $9.5B | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +70.2% | +69.3% | +66.9% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +26.7% | +23.4% | +13.9% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +6.9% | +11.8% | +0.7% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.6% | +15.0% | +28.1% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% | +5.4% | +19.1% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +57.4% | -9.5% | +3.9% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 77% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JAZZ's 23.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $358.4B | $150.6B | $14.2B | $28.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $422.3B | $216.9B | $18.3B | $32.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | 85.50x | 19.47x | -38.86x | 21.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.28x | 8.94x | 9.38x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.96x | 10.66x | 23.84x | 11.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.86x | 2.41x | 3.34x | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | — | 1.74x | 3.21x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.12x | 16.60x | 10.98x | 13.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SKYE and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-144 for SKYE. SKYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JAZZ's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs SKYE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -143.6% | +62.1% | +8.3% | +0.7% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.9% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +0.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | +23.9% | +7.5% | +2.1% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -131.4% | +21.5% | +9.0% | +2.2% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.78x | 1.26x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $63.8B | $66.3B | $4.0B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $5.2B | $1.1B | $1.4B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $273,646 | $69.1B | $67.4B | $5.4B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x | 4.02x | -3.72x | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JAZZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $399 for SKYE. Over the past 12 months, JAZZ leads with a +123.7% total return vs SKYE's -50.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JAZZ at 17.8% vs SKYE's -37.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -10.1% | +6.9% | +31.1% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.6% | +11.3% | +23.7% | +123.7% | +63.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | +50.4% | -18.4% | +63.7% | -39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | +101.3% | -13.3% | +30.0% | -30.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +295.5% | +29.6% | +53.7% | -29.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.9% | +14.6% | -6.6% | +17.8% | -15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABBV and JAZZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYE's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAZZ currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SKYE's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 0.34x | 0.54x | 0.65x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $244.81 | $28.75 | $230.40 | $202.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $176.57 | $21.97 | $97.50 | $115.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +82.8% | +92.1% | +98.5% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 46.8 | 44.2 | 77.0 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 568K | 5.8M | 33.3M | 866K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABBV as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", JAZZ as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for ABBV (target: $257) vs -4.8% for JAZZ (target: $216). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs ABBV's 3.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $256.64 | $27.27 | $216.14 | $211.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 | 39 | 48 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +6.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 15 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 | $1.72 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ABBV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SKYE vs ABBV vs PFE vs JAZZ vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -96. 0% for Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus SKYE's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Skye Bioscience, Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning SKYE is approximately 597% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AbbVie Inc. grew EPS -0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -167. 5% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, JAZZ leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -8. 3% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for SKYE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JAZZ leads at 88. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 26. 6% to $256. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), ABBV (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SKYE, JAZZ, BIIB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYE or ABBV or PFE or JAZZ or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, SKYE: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYE and ABBV and PFE and JAZZ and BIIB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JAZZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV, PFE pay a dividend while SKYE, JAZZ, BIIB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.