SKYQ
Sky Quarry Inc.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$88M
5Y Perf.-78.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SKYQ vs CLMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$3.00B
5Y Perf.+62.3%
SKYQ vs CLMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SKYQ | CLMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $88M | $3.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | -24.9% | 8.2% |
| Operating Margin | -65.8% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 452.4x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $2.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $385K | $38M |
SKYQ vs CLMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SKYQ
CLMT
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
| Calumet, Inc. (CLMT) | 100 | 162.3 | +62.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYQ vs CLMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLMT leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKYQ
Sky Quarry Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, SKYQ is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: energy exposure
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.
The Income Pick
CLMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth -5.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs SKYQ's -87.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLMT | 0.2% revenue growth vs SKYQ's -53.9% |
| Quality / Margins | CLMT | -0.9% margin vs SKYQ's -82.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CLMT | Beta 0.40 vs SKYQ's 1.39 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLMT | +204.9% vs SKYQ's -35.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CLMT | -1.4% ROA vs SKYQ's -64.9%, ROIC 0.3% vs -25.1% |
SKYQ vs CLMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
SKYQ vs CLMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLMTLAGGINGSKYQ
SKYQSky Quarry Inc.
0leads
CLMTCalumet, Inc.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SKYQMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLMT6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLMT2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CLMT4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CLMT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 246.8x SKYQ's $16M. CLMT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYQ's -82.5%. On growth, CLMT holds the edge at -2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $256M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$76M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +8.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.8% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -82.5% | -0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.0% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.4% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +139.1% | +4.1% |
CLMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $88M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.16x | -12.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 452.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.76x | 0.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.57x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CLMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.9% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.4% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $385,116 | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.35x | 0.65x |
CLMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMT five years ago would be worth $59,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,207 for SKYQ. Over the past 12 months, CLMT leads with a +204.9% total return vs SKYQ's -35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLMT at 25.7% vs SKYQ's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +77.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.2% | +204.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +98.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +496.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +830.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.6% | +25.7% |
CLMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYQ's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLMT currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs SKYQ's 20.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.45 | $36.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $11.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.4% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.0M | 1.2M |
CLMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SKYQSky Quarry Inc. | CLMTCalumet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CLMT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallCalumet, Inc. (CLMT)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SKYQ vs CLMT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYQ or CLMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 9% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). Analysts rate Calumet, Inc. (CLMT) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SKYQ or CLMT?
Over the past 5 years, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) delivered a total return of +496. 7%, compared to -87. 9% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMT returned +830. 4% versus SKYQ's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SKYQ or CLMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Sky Quarry Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning SKYQ is approximately 250% more volatile than CLMT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SKYQ or CLMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -53. 9% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sky Quarry Inc. grew EPS -234. 8% year-over-year, compared to -552. 5% for Calumet, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SKYQ or CLMT?
Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 3% net margin versus -63. 0% for Sky Quarry Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLMT leads at 0. 2% versus -32. 2% for SKYQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLMT leads at 5. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SKYQ or CLMT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SKYQ or CLMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), +830. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLMT: +830. 4%, SKYQ: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SKYQ and CLMT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SKYQ: -72.4% · CLMT: -2.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.