Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $2.47B | $20.25B | $22.48B | $13.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $959M | $4.07B | $3.24B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $-51M | $327M | $265M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 11.3% | 45.2% | 43.2% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -3.8% | 14.8% | 29.1% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 62.2x | 30.4x | 41.4x | 38.7x |
| Total Debt | $250M | $186M | $4.69B | $3.89B | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $98M | $675M | $360M | $346M |
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | 100 | 158.9 | +58.9% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 127.7 | +27.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 167.9 | +67.9% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 399.9 | +299.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth 18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- 29.2% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.7x)
- 26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
ICHR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93
- 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 5.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.2% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +356.0% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC -0.3% vs -3.9% |
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICHR leads in 1 of 6 categories
SKYT leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • ONTO leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SKYT and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 9.2x SKYT's $442M. SKYT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, SKYT holds the edge at +126.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $959M | $4.1B | $3.2B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | -$11M | $945M | $1.3B | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | -$51M | $327M | $265M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$17M | $401M | $721M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +11.3% | +45.2% | +43.2% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -3.8% | +14.8% | +29.1% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | -5.3% | +8.0% | +8.2% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -1.7% | +9.8% | +22.3% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.6% | +4.7% | +15.2% | +5.0% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +46.2% | +53.2% | +46.3% | -48.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ICHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, SKYT trades at a 86% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONTO's 68.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.5B | $20.2B | $22.5B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $2.6B | $24.3B | $26.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.55x | -46.25x | 68.83x | 95.26x | 98.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 62.25x | 30.36x | 41.38x | 38.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.69x | — | 26.70x | 19.81x | 68.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 2.61x | 5.15x | 7.03x | 13.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.22x | 3.67x | 7.49x | 5.68x | 6.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 40.74x | 56.74x | 45.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SKYT and ONTO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYT delivers a 93.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $94 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs SKYT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +93.8% | -7.5% | +12.2% | +6.7% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.8% | -5.2% | +3.7% | +3.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -3.9% | +6.5% | +9.3% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | -4.7% | +7.2% | +11.7% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.28x | 1.73x | 0.98x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $227M | $87M | $4.0B | $3.5B | -$329M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $98M | $675M | $360M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250M | $186M | $4.7B | $3.9B | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.99x | -5.97x | 2.84x | 2.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MKSI and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, SKYT leads with a +356.0% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs ENTG's 23.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.4% | +249.0% | +78.8% | +65.1% | +65.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +356.0% | +329.1% | +306.1% | +88.9% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.3% | +151.1% | +266.0% | +87.4% | +218.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | +28.9% | +66.5% | +30.4% | +312.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.4% | +629.1% | +750.6% | +1040.3% | +1431.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.9% | +35.9% | +54.1% | +23.3% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKSI is the less volatile stock with a 2.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 3.93x | 2.64x | 2.66x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.27 | $72.87 | $326.83 | $159.15 | $315.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.02 | $13.12 | $71.49 | $66.32 | $85.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +97.7% | +92.0% | +92.8% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 66.9 | 65.3 | 63.8 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 795K | 1.2M | 2.4M | 832K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SKYT and MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYT as "Hold", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $49.80 | $272.86 | $152.00 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 14 | 29 | 26 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.87 | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
ICHR leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
SKYT vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the stronger pick with 29. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
On trailing P/E, SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus SKYT's +86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 64β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 49% more volatile than MKSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is pulling ahead at 29. 2% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWater Technology, Inc. grew EPS 1843% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYT leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 31. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SKYT, ICHR, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYT or ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, SKYT: +86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYT and ICHR and MKSI and ENTG and ONTO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.