Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Software - Application
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Software - Application | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $37M | $32.05B | $11.66B | $46.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $5.30B | $1.92B | $6.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.57B | $-1.10B | $-672M | $-3.96B |
| Gross Margin | 93.7% | 78.5% | 59.4% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | -264.7% | -24.0% | -36.1% | -59.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 56.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.64B | $2.39B | $4.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.21B | $2.06B | $1.46B |
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super League Enterp… (SLE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Unity Software Inc. (U) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.57
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.57 vs U's 2.36
RBLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
- Better valuation composite
- -20.7% margin vs SLE's -309.0%
U is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +29.4% vs SLE's -97.5%
- -10.0% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC -7.8% vs -358.2%
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs RBLX's -35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -20.7% margin vs SLE's -309.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs U's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.4% vs SLE's -97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -10.0% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC -7.8% vs -358.2% |
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RBLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
U leads 1 • TTWO leads 1 • SLE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTWO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 567.0x SLE's $12M. RBLX is the more profitable business, keeping -20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLE's -309.0%. On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $5.3B | $1.9B | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.5B | -$1.1B | -$329M | -$2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.6B | -$1.1B | -$672M | -$4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $1.6B | $463M | $488M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.7% | +78.5% | +59.4% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -264.7% | -24.0% | -36.1% | -59.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -309.0% | -20.7% | -35.0% | -60.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +31.0% | +24.1% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.3% | +39.3% | +16.8% | +24.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | -9.4% | -3.2% | +29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RBLX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $32.0B | $11.7B | $46.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $32.5B | $12.0B | $49.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.78x | -29.07x | -27.84x | -8.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 56.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 312.54x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 6.55x | 6.31x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 220.35x | 82.33x | 3.22x | 18.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.69x | 28.87x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
U leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
U delivers a -19.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-20 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SLE. U carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLE's 29.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBLX scores 6/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -2.9% | -19.8% | -113.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -410.7% | -12.2% | -10.0% | -39.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | -87.7% | -7.8% | -49.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -31.0% | -7.6% | -57.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 29.26x | 4.36x | 0.68x | 1.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $431M | $330M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.53x | -27.89x | -25.48x | -69.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTWO five years ago would be worth $13,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SLE. Over the past 12 months, U leads with a +29.4% total return vs SLE's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 21.2% vs SLE's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.2% | -44.7% | -39.6% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.5% | -36.4% | +29.4% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +23.4% | -5.7% | +77.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -34.1% | -70.1% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -35.6% | -60.9% | +544.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.7% | +7.3% | -1.9% | +21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLE and TTWO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than U's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TTWO currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs SLE's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.40x | 2.37x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $196.80 | $150.59 | $52.15 | $264.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.22 | $41.75 | $16.78 | $187.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +29.7% | +51.3% | +84.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 29.0 | 63.9 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 9.1M | 13.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RBLX as "Buy", U as "Buy", TTWO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.7% upside for RBLX (target: $88) vs 29.8% for TTWO (target: $290).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.63 | $35.71 | $290.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 26 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RBLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). U leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Analysts rate Roblox Corporation (RBLX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO?
Over the past 5 years, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) delivered a total return of +31. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +535. 5% versus SLE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Super League Enterprise, Inc.
(SLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Unity Software Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning U is approximately 275% more volatile than SLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 29% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super League Enterprise, Inc. grew EPS 82. 8% year-over-year, compared to -16. 2% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO?
Unity Software Inc.
(U) is the more profitable company, earning -21. 8% net margin versus -102. 8% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — meaning it keeps -21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: U leads at -22. 8% versus -103. 5% for SLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBLX leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 95.
7% to $87. 63.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), +535. 5% 10Y return). Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTWO: +535. 5%, U: -58. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLE and RBLX and U and TTWO?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLE (Communication Services) and RBLX (Technology) and U (Technology) and TTWO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; U is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.