Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $4.25B | $11.35B | $6.21B | $2.36B | $5.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.58B | $12.37B | $5.36B | $5.73B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $283M | $737M | $506M | $11M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 18.3% | 29.8% | 10.0% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 4.9% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 12.5x | 12.4x | 16.0x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.62B | $6.17B | $4.10B | $4.42B | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $879M | $344M | $522M | $378M |
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.32 vs AMBP's 0.81
- +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
AMBP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 11.1% yield, vs SON's 4.0%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.05x
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.62 vs 9.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs AMBP's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs AMBP's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 11.1% yield, vs SON's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 6.2% vs 6.5% |
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SON leads 2 • AMBP leads 1 • SLGN leads 0 • CCK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 2.3x SEE's $5.4B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $12.4B | $5.4B | $5.7B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $966M | $2.1B | $965M | $753M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $283M | $737M | $506M | $11M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $1.1B | $459M | $209M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +18.3% | +29.8% | +10.0% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +13.2% | +13.5% | +4.9% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +6.0% | +9.4% | +0.2% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +8.9% | +8.6% | +3.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +7.7% | +2.1% | +18.6% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -56.6% | +16.4% | +58.0% | +23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 22% valuation discount to CCK's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SON offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $11.3B | $6.2B | $2.4B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $16.6B | $10.0B | $6.3B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.91x | 15.85x | 12.29x | -214.95x | 12.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.60x | 12.46x | 12.38x | 15.97x | 8.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | 9.66x | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.97x | 7.96x | 14.33x | 8.47x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.92x | 1.16x | 0.43x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 3.36x | 5.02x | — | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.07x | 10.34x | 13.54x | 8.92x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SON leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. SON carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +21.8% | +48.4% | — | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +5.2% | +7.1% | +0.2% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +14.1% | +11.2% | +6.5% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +16.0% | +14.1% | +6.9% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 1.77x | 3.31x | — | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $5.3B | $3.8B | $3.9B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $879M | $344M | $522M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $6.2B | $4.1B | $4.4B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.36x | 4.00x | 1.95x | 1.08x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMBP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,388 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.4% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | -2.6% | +2.0% | -2.3% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.7% | +5.3% | +44.2% | +20.2% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.1% | +23.5% | +2.4% | +34.6% | -3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | -6.9% | -19.1% | -46.1% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.8% | +98.0% | +4.4% | -44.4% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +7.3% | +0.8% | +10.4% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.48x | 0.32x | 0.81x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.04 | $116.62 | $44.27 | $5.03 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.15 | $89.21 | $28.15 | $3.29 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.6% | +86.7% | +95.2% | +78.6% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 46.9 | 64.0 | 46.5 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 769K | 984K | 3.0M | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMBP and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLGN as "Buy", CCK as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", AMBP as "Hold", SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.50 | $120.50 | $43.50 | $4.52 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 25 | 27 | 6 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.0% | +1.9% | +11.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.04 | $0.81 | $0.44 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SON leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP vs SON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Crown Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -46. 1% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus AMBP's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 150% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonoco Products Company (SON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, AMBP: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLGN and CCK and SEE and AMBP and SON?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.