Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $4.25B | $6.21B | $5.09B | $3.15B | $20.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.58B | $5.36B | $7.49B | $8.65B | $8.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $283M | $506M | $1.04B | $274M | $773M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 29.8% | 20.9% | 13.4% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 13.5% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 12.4x | 8.9x | 12.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.62B | $4.10B | $4.85B | $5.57B | $4.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $344M | $378M | $261M | $529M |
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Graphic Packaging H… (GPK) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
| Packaging Corporati… (PKG) | 100 | 221.5 | +121.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.31 vs GPK's 0.95
- +39.8% vs GPK's -50.4%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.05x
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
GPK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.1%
PKG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 301.6% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs GPK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.62 vs 1.80 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs GPK's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs GPK's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs GPK's -50.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs GPK's 2.3%, ROIC 6.2% vs 7.7% |
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories
PKG leads 2 • GPK leads 1 • SLGN leads 0 • SON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 1.7x SEE's $5.4B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPK's 3.2%. On growth, PKG holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $5.4B | $7.5B | $8.7B | $9.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $966M | $965M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $283M | $506M | $1.0B | $274M | $773M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $459M | $266M | $293M | $729M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +29.8% | +20.9% | +13.4% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +13.5% | +8.7% | +7.5% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +9.4% | +13.8% | +3.2% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +8.6% | +3.6% | +3.4% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +2.1% | -1.9% | +1.7% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +16.4% | +23.6% | -133.3% | -53.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GPK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, GPK trades at a 73% valuation discount to PKG's 26.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GPK offers better value at 0.36x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $6.2B | $5.1B | $3.1B | $20.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $10.0B | $9.6B | $8.5B | $23.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.91x | 12.29x | 12.95x | 7.18x | 26.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.57x | 12.38x | 8.86x | 12.46x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.66x | 0.91x | 0.36x | 2.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.97x | 14.33x | 7.76x | 6.02x | 12.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 1.16x | 0.68x | 0.36x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 5.02x | 1.41x | 0.95x | 4.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.07x | 13.54x | 12.95x | — | 27.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PKG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $8 for GPK. PKG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs PKG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +48.4% | +30.0% | +8.4% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +7.1% | +9.0% | +2.3% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +11.2% | +6.2% | +7.7% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +14.1% | +8.3% | +9.3% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 3.31x | 1.34x | 1.67x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $3.8B | $4.5B | $5.3B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $344M | $378M | $261M | $529M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $4.1B | $4.9B | $5.6B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.36x | 1.95x | 4.60x | 5.47x | 13.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PKG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PKG five years ago would be worth $16,084 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,462 for GPK. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +39.8% total return vs GPK's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PKG at 20.8% vs GPK's -22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | +2.0% | +18.6% | -29.1% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.7% | +39.8% | +20.4% | -50.4% | +25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.1% | +2.4% | -2.5% | -54.2% | +76.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | -18.8% | -10.0% | -35.4% | +60.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.8% | +4.4% | +49.4% | +9.6% | +301.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +0.8% | -0.8% | -22.9% | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPK's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs GPK's 44.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.31x | 0.53x | 0.95x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.04 | $44.27 | $58.43 | $23.76 | $249.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.15 | $28.15 | $38.65 | $8.79 | $178.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.6% | +95.2% | +88.2% | +44.7% | +90.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 64.0 | 48.7 | 65.7 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 766K | 3.0M | 1.1M | 7.1M | 908K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SON and GPK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLGN as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", SON as "Buy", GPK as "Buy", PKG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, GPK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.50 | $43.50 | $59.00 | $12.20 | $247.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 27 | 21 | 27 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.9% | +4.1% | +4.1% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.81 | $2.09 | $0.43 | $5.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +5.9% | +0.8% |
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PKG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SLGN vs SEE vs SON vs GPK vs PKG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
On trailing P/E, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the cheapest at 7.
2x versus Packaging Corporation of America at 26. 2x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
Over the past 5 years, Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) delivered a total return of +60.
8%, compared to -35. 4% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PKG returned +301. 6% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Graphic Packaging Holding Company's 0. 95β — meaning GPK is approximately 202% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 95% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKG leads at 14. 0% versus 9. 5% for SON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Packaging Corporation of America — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).
09Is SLGN or SEE or SON or GPK or PKG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, GPK: +9. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLGN and SEE and SON and GPK and PKG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPK is a small-cap deep-value stock; PKG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.