Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $61M | $7.27B | $5.86B | $6.65B | $112.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $935M | $3.06B | $7.49B | $3.82B | $29.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $122M | $248M | $142M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 15.8% | 10.4% | 11.9% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 8.7% | 4.9% | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 46.6x | 18.1x | 44.0x | 57.4x |
| Total Debt | $321M | $1.69B | $1.28B | $104M | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $156M | $541M | $150M | $440M |
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southland Holdings,… (SLND) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 446.7 | +346.7% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 450.4 | +350.4% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 386.6 | +286.6% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 654.7 | +554.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLND is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.53 vs PRIM's 1.83
ROAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 54.2% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5%
- 4.0% margin vs SLND's -10.1%
PRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.98 vs PWR's 3.33
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MYRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum and efficiency.
- +175.2% vs SLND's -66.4%
- 8.7% ROA vs SLND's -8.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs -19.8%
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.1%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.2% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs SLND's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs PRIM's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs SLND's -66.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SLND's -8.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs -19.8% |
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ROAD leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • SLND leads 0 • PWR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROAD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 32.1x SLND's $935M. ROAD is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLND's -10.1%. On growth, ROAD holds the edge at +44.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $935M | $3.1B | $7.5B | $3.8B | $30.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $430M | $437M | $261M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | $122M | $248M | $142M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $187M | $165M | $231M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +15.8% | +10.4% | +11.9% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +8.7% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | +4.0% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.1% | +2.2% | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +44.1% | -5.4% | +20.0% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.2% | +6.5% | -60.5% | +106.2% | +51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $7.3B | $5.9B | $6.7B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $8.8B | $6.6B | $6.6B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.52x | 71.39x | 21.52x | 56.76x | 110.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 46.61x | 18.06x | 44.03x | 57.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.81x | 1.17x | 3.40x | 6.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.69x | 13.03x | 28.84x | 45.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 2.59x | 0.77x | 1.82x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 7.98x | 3.52x | 10.18x | 12.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 47.42x | 17.20x | 28.66x | 69.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-63 for SLND. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs SLND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -62.8% | +12.6% | +15.2% | +22.1% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | +3.6% | +5.6% | +8.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.8% | +10.3% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.1% | +12.6% | +16.3% | +19.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 1.85x | 0.76x | 0.16x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $1.5B | $735M | -$47M | $748M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $156M | $541M | $150M | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $321M | $1.7B | $1.3B | $104M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.34x | 2.56x | 21.02x | 39.49x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ROAD and MYRG and PWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,159 for SLND. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs SLND's -66.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROAD at 67.5% vs SLND's -44.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.3% | +17.1% | -17.2% | +88.5% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.4% | +46.1% | +62.4% | +175.2% | +132.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.2% | +370.3% | +346.5% | +219.8% | +345.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +324.4% | +234.4% | +417.6% | +651.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +985.6% | +402.0% | +1680.8% | +3143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.8% | +67.5% | +64.7% | +47.3% | +64.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLND and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLND is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLND's 21.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.50x | 1.83x | 1.70x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.34 | $141.90 | $205.50 | $475.39 | $788.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $88.88 | $65.23 | $152.10 | $315.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.2% | +92.6% | +52.6% | +89.9% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 65.5 | 30.3 | 80.7 | 87.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 399K | 489K | 1.1M | 306K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRIM and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ROAD as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.33 | $160.63 | $362.00 | $647.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 22 | 21 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.32 | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
ROAD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SLND vs ROAD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs PWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -88. 4% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus SLND's -88. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southland Holdings, Inc.
(SLND) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 244% more volatile than SLND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -436. 0% for Southland Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
6% net margin versus -10. 7% for Southland Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROAD leads at 8. 5% versus -12. 9% for SLND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROAD leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SLND, ROAD, MYRG, PWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLND or ROAD or PRIM or MYRG or PWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLND and ROAD and PRIM and MYRG and PWR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.