Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLQT vs AMSF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$201M
5Y Perf.-95.9%
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$569M
5Y Perf.-50.6%

SLQT vs AMSF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLQT logoSLQT
AMSF logoAMSF
IndustryInsurance - BrokersInsurance - Specialty
Market Cap$201M$569M
Revenue (TTM)$1.64B$325M
Net Income (TTM)$73M$46M
Gross Margin69.8%47.6%
Operating Margin3.5%17.8%
Forward P/E85.7x14.4x
Total Debt$416M$491K
Cash & Equiv.$32M$62M

SLQT vs AMSFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLQT
AMSF
StockMay 20May 26Return
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT)1004.1-95.9%
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)10049.4-50.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLQT vs AMSF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSF leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SelectQuote, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.96
  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 15.5% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 31.8% 10Y total return vs SLQT's -95.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Beta 0.23, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLQT logoSLQT15.5% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
ValueAMSF logoAMSFLower P/E (14.4x vs 85.7x)
Quality / MarginsAMSF logoAMSFCombined ratio 0.8 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyAMSF logoAMSFBeta 0.23 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
DividendsAMSF logoAMSF8.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMSF logoAMSF-29.2% vs SLQT's -57.6%
Efficiency (ROA)SLQT logoSLQT5.7% ROA vs AMSF's 5.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 21.9%

SLQT vs AMSF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
52.1%$798M
Pharmacy
47.6%$729M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$4M
AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SLQT vs AMSF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMSFLAGGINGSLQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 5.1x AMSF's $325M. AMSF is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%. On growth, AMSF holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$325M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$58M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$73M$46M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.8%+47.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.5%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.5%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.8%+2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.6%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-114.5%-8.5%
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SLQT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 86% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLQT's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSF's 8.5x.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$201M$569M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$584M$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS85.71x12.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.57x8.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x1.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x2.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.83x
SLQT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMSF leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

SLQT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMSF. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%+9.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+21.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.7%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.72x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$384M-$61M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$62M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$416M$491,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.11x
AMSF leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SLQT and AMSF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMSF five years ago would be worth $8,110 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, AMSF leads with a -29.2% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLQT at -7.1% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.8%-18.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-57.6%-29.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.7%-24.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%-18.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%+31.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.1%-9.1%
Evenly matched — SLQT and AMSF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMSF currently trades 62.4% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.80$48.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.56$29.42
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.7%+62.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.734.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M212K
AMSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SLQT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates SLQT as "Hold" and AMSF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 46.9% for AMSF (target: $45). AMSF is the only dividend payer here at 8.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$44.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%
SLQT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMSF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLQT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLQT vs AMSF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLQT or AMSF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLQT or AMSF?

On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or AMSF?

Over the past 5 years, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) delivered a total return of -18. 9%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSF returned +31. 8% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLQT or AMSF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately 750% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLQT or AMSF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLQT leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLQT or AMSF?

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SLQT or AMSF more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 250.

9% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or AMSF?

In this comparison, AMSF (8.

4% yield) pays a dividend. SLQT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SLQT or AMSF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SLQT and AMSF?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock. AMSF pays a dividend while SLQT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SLQT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SLQT and AMSF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SLQT: 5.6% · AMSF: 10.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(SLQT: 4.5% · AMSF: 14.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SLQT: 85.7x · AMSF: 12.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.