Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $153.06B | $88.60B | $31.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $13.42B | $26.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $4.33B | $2.73B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | — | 56.7% | 27.8% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 52.2% | 27.8% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.4x | 23.1x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $7.41B | $11.50B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $4.30B | $3.35B | $5.01B |
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Resources I… (SLSR) | 100 | 471.8 | +371.8% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 404.7 | +304.7% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 394.9 | +294.9% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 563.1 | +463.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 1.01 vs SCCO's 1.88
- +149.1% vs FCX's +66.1%
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs TECK's 6.4%
- Beta 1.88, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs SLSR's -6.8%
- 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.85, yield 1.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs SCCO's 1.27
- Better valuation composite
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs SLSR's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs SCCO's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.1% vs FCX's +66.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs SLSR's -99.7%, ROIC 38.6% vs -444.5% |
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
FCX leads 1 • SLSR leads 0 • TECK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX and SLSR operate at a comparable scale, with $26.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $13.4B | $26.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $7.9B | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | $4.3B | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $3.4B | $6.2B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +56.7% | +27.8% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +52.2% | +27.8% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +32.3% | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +25.5% | +23.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +39.0% | +12.2% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +54.5% | +154.2% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FCX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.3x trailing earnings, TECK trades at a 23% valuation discount to FCX's 40.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.35x vs SCCO's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $153.1B | $88.6B | $31.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $156.2B | $96.8B | $35.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.68x | 35.36x | 40.56x | 31.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.44x | 23.07x | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.84x | 11.34x | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.41x | 3.44x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 13.99x | 2.89x | 1.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.67x | 79.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SLSR. FCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs SLSR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | +42.0% | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.7% | +21.4% | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +38.6% | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -145.1% | +39.2% | +12.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $3.1B | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $4.3B | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $7.4B | $11.5B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.10x | 19.33x | 17.68x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TECK five years ago would be worth $26,761 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,981 for SLSR. Over the past 12 months, SLSR leads with a +149.1% total return vs FCX's +66.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCO at 37.3% vs TECK's 14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.0% | +25.3% | +19.3% | +35.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.1% | +115.6% | +66.1% | +87.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.0% | +158.7% | +73.6% | +49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.8% | +163.0% | +50.9% | +167.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +367.4% | +690.4% | +517.6% | +643.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.0% | +37.3% | +20.2% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLSR and TECK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLSR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCCO's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SCCO's 82.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.88x | 1.85x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $223.89 | $70.97 | $64.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $86.25 | $35.15 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +82.8% | +86.9% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 50.6 | 48.5 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 106K | 1.6M | 15.2M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLSR as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for SLSR (target: $16) vs -15.6% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs TECK's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $156.40 | $67.00 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 30 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.96 | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.4% |
SCCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SLSR vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 31.
3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 6x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) delivered a total return of +167.
6%, compared to +9. 8% for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +690. 4% versus SLSR's +367. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 88β — meaning SCCO is approximately 86% more volatile than SLSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to -62. 1% for Solaris Resources Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCCO leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Solaris Resources Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for SLSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLSR: 57. 0% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
6% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLSR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLSR or SCCO or FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +367. 4% 10Y return). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLSR: +367. 4%, FCX: +517. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLSR and SCCO and FCX and TECK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX, TECK pay a dividend while SLSR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.