Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Copper | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $2.26B | $148.31B | $87.11B | $29.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $673M | $13.42B | $26.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-30M | $4.33B | $2.73B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.0% | 56.7% | 27.8% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.5% | 52.2% | 27.8% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 25.4x | 22.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $747M | $7.41B | $11.50B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $188M | $4.30B | $3.35B | $5.01B |
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Resources I… (SLSR) | 100 | 467.1 | +367.1% |
| Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) | 100 | 755.2 | +655.2% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 392.1 | +292.1% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 388.3 | +288.3% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 527.3 | +427.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.01 vs TGB's 1.80
TGB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs SCCO's 6.7%
- +275.6% vs FCX's +65.3%
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs SLSR's -6.8%
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
- Better valuation composite
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs SLSR's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs TGB's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +275.6% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs SLSR's -99.7%, ROIC 38.6% vs -444.5% |
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCX leads 1 • TGB leads 1 • SLSR leads 0 • TECK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX and SLSR operate at a comparable scale, with $26.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGB's -4.5%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $673M | $13.4B | $26.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $249M | $7.9B | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$30M | $4.3B | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $15M | $3.4B | $6.2B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.0% | +56.7% | +27.8% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +20.5% | +52.2% | +27.8% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.5% | +32.3% | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.2% | +25.5% | +23.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +45.3% | +39.0% | +12.2% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +117.7% | +54.5% | +154.2% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FCX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.3x trailing earnings, TECK trades at a 27% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.3B | $148.3B | $87.1B | $29.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $2.7B | $151.4B | $95.3B | $33.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.47x | -106.48x | 34.26x | 39.88x | 29.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.15x | 25.40x | 22.41x | 12.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.64x | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.62x | 19.24x | 11.16x | 12.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.58x | 11.05x | 3.38x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.46x | 13.55x | 2.84x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 43.28x | 78.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SLSR. FCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGB's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs SLSR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -5.0% | +42.0% | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.7% | -1.3% | +21.4% | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +8.4% | +38.6% | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -145.1% | +6.5% | +39.2% | +12.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.96x | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $559M | $3.1B | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $188M | $4.3B | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $747M | $7.4B | $11.5B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.10x | 0.44x | 19.33x | 17.68x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGB five years ago would be worth $30,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,745 for SLSR. Over the past 12 months, TGB leads with a +275.6% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGB at 68.3% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.7% | +29.5% | +21.4% | +17.3% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +133.0% | +275.6% | +110.5% | +65.3% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +377.0% | +151.0% | +70.7% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +203.3% | +167.4% | +44.3% | +147.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +362.8% | +1267.9% | +668.4% | +507.7% | +599.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +68.3% | +35.9% | +19.5% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLSR and TECK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLSR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGB's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs TGB's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.80x | 1.78x | 1.79x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $9.25 | $223.89 | $70.97 | $63.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $1.89 | $85.72 | $35.15 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +78.4% | +80.2% | +85.4% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 56.1 | 54.1 | 49.1 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 106K | 4.9M | 1.6M | 15.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLSR as "Buy", TGB as "Hold", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for SLSR (target: $16) vs -48.3% for TGB (target: $4). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $3.75 | $156.40 | $67.00 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 30 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.96 | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.5% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SLSR vs TGB vs SCCO vs FCX vs TECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 29.
3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +203.
3%, compared to +7. 5% for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1268% versus SLSR's +362. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 1. 80β — meaning TGB is approximately 79% more volatile than SLSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for SLSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLSR: 58. 6% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLSR, TGB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLSR or TGB or SCCO or FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, TGB: +1268%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLSR and TGB and SCCO and FCX and TECK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX, TECK pay a dividend while SLSR, TGB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.