Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Application | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $5.35B | $4.04B | $12.50B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.33B | $6.05B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $70M | $4M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 38.2% | 41.3% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -189.5% | 9.3% | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.1x | 99.1x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $63M | $1.93B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $365M | $1.60B | $687M |
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SportsMap Tech Acqu… (SMAP) | 100 | 268.7 | +168.7% |
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 100 | 84.7 | -15.3% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 171.0% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- 36.3% NII/revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
- +16.3% vs SRAD's -41.4%
SRAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 1.17x
- 5.2% margin vs SMAP's -290.4%
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% NII/revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs SMAP's -290.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs SRAD's -41.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs SMAP's -104.6%, ROIC 12.9% vs -114.7% |
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SRAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PENN leads 1 • SMAP leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 940.4x SMAP's $7M. SRAD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMAP's -2.9%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.3B | $6.1B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $308M | $266M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $70M | $4M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $363M | $612M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +38.2% | +41.3% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -189.5% | +9.3% | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +5.2% | +0.1% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +27.3% | +10.1% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.2% | +42.8% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.3% | -128.5% | +192.9% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PENN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $4.0B | $12.5B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $3.7B | $12.8B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -241.80x | 38.69x | -3113.58x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.09x | 99.14x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.68x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.74x | 49.42x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 722.95x | 2.77x | 2.06x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 435.49x | 3.79x | 19.81x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.98x | 19.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-150 for SMAP. SRAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs SRAD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.0% | +7.3% | +0.5% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.6% | +2.7% | +0.1% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -114.7% | +12.9% | -0.9% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -155.2% | +5.3% | -0.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.06x | 3.06x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$302M | $330M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $365M | $1.6B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $63M | $1.9B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -336.84x | 2.02x | 1.92x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMAP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMAP five years ago would be worth $27,103 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, SMAP leads with a +16.3% total return vs SRAD's -41.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMAP at 36.8% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | -41.5% | -29.3% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | -41.4% | -27.3% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.0% | +5.7% | +4.3% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.0% | -45.5% | -47.9% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.0% | -45.5% | +157.3% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.8% | +1.9% | +1.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMAP and SRAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMAP currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SRAD's 42.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.65x | 1.12x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.60 | $32.22 | $48.78 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.72 | $11.66 | $20.46 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +42.3% | +51.7% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 38.7 | 55.1 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 593 | 3.6M | 12.9M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRAD as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.5% upside for SRAD (target: $22) vs 18.5% for PENN (target: $20).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.75 | $36.88 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 48 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +6.6% | +15.8% |
SRAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SMAP vs SRAD vs DKNG vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SportsMap Tech Acquisition Corp.
(SMAP) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
On forward P/E, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, SportsMap Tech Acquisition Corp.
(SMAP) delivered a total return of +171. 0%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMAP returned +171. 0% versus SRAD's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 105% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SportsMap Tech Acquisition Corp.
(SMAP) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus -290. 4% for SportsMap Tech Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRAD leads at 9. 1% versus -189. 5% for SMAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMAP leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 76. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SRAD: 59. 5% to $21. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMAP or SRAD or DKNG or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -45. 5%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMAP and SRAD and DKNG and PENN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMAP (Financial Services) and SRAD (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMAP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.