Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SMBK logo
SMBK
HOMB logo
HOMB
IBCP logo
IBCP
FFIN logo
FFIN
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$777M
5Y Perf.+181.0%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+83.7%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+16.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMBK logoSMBK
HOMB logoHOMB
IBCP logoIBCP
FFIN logoFFIN
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$777M$5.58B$730M$4.83B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$316M$1.37B$310M$826M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$50M$475M$69M$254M$57.05B
Gross Margin61.0%77.3%69.1%71.8%60.0%
Operating Margin19.4%43.8%26.2%37.5%25.9%
Forward P/E12.5x11.5x10.0x16.5x14.4x
Total Debt$102M$935M$117M$22M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$464M$667M$52M$1.08B$343.34B

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMBK
HOMB
IBCP
FFIN
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)100281.0+181.0%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100183.7+83.7%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
First Financial Ban… (FFIN)100116.5+16.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOMB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. SmartFinancial, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. IBCP, FFIN, and JPM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HOMB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SMBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
  • +41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • NIM 3.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.66 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
Best for: growth
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs SMBK's 198.2%
  • PEG 0.81 vs FFIN's 3.67
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFFIN logoFFIN11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67
Quality / MarginsHOMB logoHOMBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHOMB logoHOMBBeta 0.66 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsIBCP logoIBCP2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)SMBK logoSMBK+41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HOMB logoHOMBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4%

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMBKSmartFinancial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
53.7%$47M
Deposit Account
46.3%$40M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
FFINFirst Financial Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2018
Fiduciary and Trust
43.4%$28M
Deposit Account
33.3%$22M
Mortgage Banking
23.3%$15M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHOMBLAGGINGSMBK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$316M$1.4B$310M$826M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$618M$89M$320M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$475M$69M$254M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$311M$70M$283M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+77.3%+69.1%+71.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+43.8%+26.2%+37.5%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+34.6%+22.1%+30.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+22.6%+22.6%+34.3%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%+26.0%+2.3%-7.7%+16.0%
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 43% valuation discount to FFIN's 19.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$777M$5.6B$730M$4.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$414M$5.9B$795M$3.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.26x11.72x10.85x19.01x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.50x11.47x9.99x16.54x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x0.89x2.06x4.22x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.93x9.47x9.78x11.79x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.46x4.06x2.32x5.85x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x1.30x1.47x2.52x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.10x11.58x10.41x15.72x8.88x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for SMBK. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.5%+11.4%+14.2%+14.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+2.1%+1.3%+1.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+8.7%+10.2%+12.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+11.5%+2.6%+16.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966885
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.22x0.23x0.01x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$363M$268M$65M-$1.1B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$667M$52M$1.1B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$102M$935M$117M$22M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x1.47x0.91x1.54x0.74x
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.8%+2.7%+12.0%+13.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.8%+3.0%+16.4%-5.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+31.2%+110.4%+24.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.6%+22.1%+80.9%-25.9%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.2%+57.7%+194.4%+136.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+9.5%+28.1%+7.5%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.77x0.66x0.72x0.78x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.63$30.83$39.16$38.74$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.95$25.50$29.63$28.11$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+91.6%+90.6%+86.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.163.761.261.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K1.4M135K683K7.0M
Evenly matched — SMBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HOMB and IBCP and FFIN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs SMBK's 0.71%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$31.50$38.00$39.25$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts91971561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+2.8%+2.9%+2.2%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015111515
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.80$1.03$0.74$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.5%+1.7%0.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — HOMB and IBCP and FFIN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHome Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMBK vs HOMB vs IBCP vs FFIN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 44% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).

09

Is SMBK or HOMB or IBCP or FFIN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, FFIN: +136. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMBK and HOMB and IBCP and FFIN and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.