Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $777M | $1.69B | $730M | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $968M | $310M | $644M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $59M | $69M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 48.6% | 69.1% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 8.3% | 26.2% | 43.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.3x | 10.0x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $396M | $117M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $560M | $52M | $108M |
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
- 198.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
- PEG 0.96 vs CVBF's 4.64
- 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs IBCP's 2.9%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
- NIM 3.3% vs HOPE's 2.5%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 1.90 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs HOPE's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs IBCP's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • SMBK leads 1 • HOPE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $968M annually — 3.1x IBCP's $310M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $968M | $310M | $644M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $84M | $89M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $59M | $69M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $147M | $70M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +48.6% | +69.1% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +8.3% | +26.2% | +43.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +6.0% | +22.1% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +15.2% | +22.6% | +33.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +35.0% | +2.3% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMBK offers better value at 1.18x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $1.7B | $730M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $1.5B | $795M | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 28.67x | 10.85x | 13.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.33x | 9.99x | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | — | 2.06x | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 18.21x | 9.78x | 13.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 1.74x | 2.32x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 11.14x | 10.41x | 13.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SMBK and IBCP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVBF's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +2.6% | +14.2% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +2.3% | +10.2% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | -$164M | $65M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $560M | $52M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $396M | $117M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.17x | 0.91x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,696 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.1% vs CVBF's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +22.7% | +12.0% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +31.7% | +16.4% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +66.1% | +110.4% | +64.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +7.0% | +80.9% | +15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +19.5% | +194.4% | +66.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +18.4% | +28.1% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOPE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.97x | 0.72x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $13.19 | $39.16 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $9.44 | $29.63 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +100.0% | +90.6% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 64.6 | 61.2 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 803K | 135K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 7.1% for IBCP (target: $38). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $14.50 | $38.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +4.2% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.55 | $1.03 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +2.8% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SmartFinancial, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +7. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus HOPE's +19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HOPE is approximately 34% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 43% for CVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, HOPE: +19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and HOPE and IBCP and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.