Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SMBK logo
SMBK
HOPE logo
HOPE
KO logo
KO
IBCP logo
IBCP
CVBF logo
CVBF
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$777M
5Y Perf.+181.0%
HOPE
Hope Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.+43.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.88B
5Y Perf.+13.3%

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMBK logoSMBK
HOPE logoHOPE
KO logoKO
IBCP logoIBCP
CVBF logoCVBF
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$777M$1.69B$355.61B$730M$2.88B
Revenue (TTM)$316M$968M$49.28B$310M$644M
Net Income (TTM)$50M$59M$13.70B$69M$209M
Gross Margin61.0%48.6%61.7%69.1%79.7%
Operating Margin19.4%8.3%29.3%26.2%43.7%
Forward P/E12.5x12.3x25.3x10.0x14.7x
Total Debt$102M$396M$45.49B$117M$991M
Cash & Equiv.$464M$560M$10.27B$52M$108M

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMBK
HOPE
KO
IBCP
CVBF
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)100281.0+181.0%
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE)100143.1+43.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF)100113.3+13.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SMBK and IBCP are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Independent Bank Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. HOPE, KO, and CVBF also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SMBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
  • 198.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • PEG 0.96 vs CVBF's 4.64
  • 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HOPE
Hope Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: dividends
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs HOPE's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%
Best for: efficiency
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • NIM 3.3% vs HOPE's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 32.5% margin vs HOPE's 6.0%
Best for: quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSMBK logoSMBK10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
ValueIBCP logoIBCPLower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 1.90 vs 4.64
Quality / MarginsCVBF logoCVBF32.5% margin vs HOPE's 6.0%
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.72 vs HOPE's 0.97
DividendsHOPE logoHOPE4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)SMBK logoSMBK+41.8% vs CVBF's +16.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs HOPE's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMBKSmartFinancial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
CVBFCVB Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
52.3%$19M
Fiduciary and Trust
40.4%$15M
Credit Card
7.3%$3M

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSMBKLAGGINGHOPE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 159.1x IBCP's $310M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$316M$968M$49.3B$310M$644M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$84M$15.5B$89M$294M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$59M$13.7B$69M$209M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$147M$12.6B$70M$217M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+48.6%+61.7%+69.1%+79.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+8.3%+29.3%+26.2%+43.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+6.0%+27.8%+22.1%+32.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+15.2%+25.5%+22.6%+33.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%+35.0%+18.2%+2.3%+11.1%
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMBK offers better value at 1.18x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
Market CapShares × price$777M$1.7B$355.6B$730M$2.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$414M$1.5B$390.8B$795M$3.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.26x28.67x27.18x10.85x13.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.50x12.33x25.27x9.99x14.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x2.43x2.06x4.40x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.93x18.21x26.39x9.78x13.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.46x1.74x7.42x2.32x4.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x0.74x10.40x1.47x1.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.10x11.14x67.15x10.41x13.26x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.5%+2.6%+41.1%+14.2%+9.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.3%+13.1%+1.3%+1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+2.3%+15.8%+10.2%+6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+0.9%+17.3%+2.6%+9.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966786
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.17x1.33x0.23x0.43x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$363M-$164M$35.2B$65M$883M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$560M$10.3B$52M$108M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$102M$396M$45.5B$117M$991M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x0.17x10.70x0.91x2.12x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,696 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.1% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.8%+22.7%+20.3%+12.0%+14.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.8%+31.7%+17.2%+16.4%+16.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+66.1%+47.0%+110.4%+64.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.6%+7.0%+65.6%+80.9%+15.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.2%+19.5%+121.1%+194.4%+66.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+18.4%+13.7%+28.1%+18.0%
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOPE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.77x0.97x-0.20x0.72x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.63$13.19$84.04$39.16$21.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.95$9.44$65.35$29.63$17.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+100.0%+98.3%+90.6%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.164.660.661.260.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K803K12.7M135K1.6M
Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", KO as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs SMBK's 0.71%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…HOPE logoHOPEHope Bancorp, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$14.50$86.13$38.00$24.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts9648716
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+4.2%+2.5%+2.9%+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0056110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.55$2.04$1.03$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+1.7%+2.8%
Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMBK vs HOPE vs KO vs IBCP vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SmartFinancial, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +7. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus HOPE's +19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HOPE is approximately -583% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

CVB Financial Corp.

(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).

09

Is SMBK or HOPE or KO or IBCP or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, HOPE: +19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMBK and HOPE and KO and IBCP and CVBF?

These companies operate in different sectors (SMBK (Financial Services) and HOPE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and IBCP (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.