Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $136.67B | $38.92B | $106.56B | $33.76B | $825.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.66T | $50.69T | $8.60T | $39.77T | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.39T | $5.84T | $1.01T | $5.00T | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 53.3% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 16.8% | 13.8% | 17.9% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 0.0x | 0.1x | 0.0x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $58.30T | $0.00 | $60.89T | $154.21T | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75.59T | $0.00 | $72.48T | $21.14T | $469.32B |
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sumitomo Mitsui Fin… (SMFG) | 100 | 373.0 | +273.0% |
| KB Financial Group … (KB) | 100 | 401.2 | +301.2% |
| Mizuho Financial Gr… (MFG) | 100 | 347.8 | +247.8% |
| Shinhan Financial G… (SHG) | 100 | 276.5 | +176.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 3.1%
- 314.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 461.3%
- Beta 1.11, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.45x
- 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 20.1%
- PEG 0.00 vs JPM's 1.06
- 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs MFG's 9.5%
MFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SHG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SHG's 0.4%
SHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and stability.
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 13.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 1.06
- Beta 0.89 vs KB's 1.22
- +89.9% vs JPM's +25.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.65x
- NIM 2.3% vs MFG's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs MFG's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 13.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 1.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SHG's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs KB's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.9% vs JPM's +25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SHG's 0.4% |
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHG leads 2 • KB leads 1 • SMFG leads 0 • MFG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KB is the larger business by revenue, generating $50.69T annually — 187.2x JPM's $270.8B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MFG's 10.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.66T | $50.69T | $8.60T | $39.77T | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.95T | $9.21T | $1.30T | $8.41T | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.39T | $5.84T | $1.01T | $5.00T | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$8.38T | $0 | -$10.55T | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | +49.1% | +41.8% | +53.3% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +16.8% | +13.8% | +17.9% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +11.5% | +10.3% | +12.7% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | — | -48.4% | +15.6% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.0% | +12.6% | +46.9% | +48.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SHG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, SHG trades at a 51% valuation discount to MFG's 19.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KB offers better value at 0.88x vs MFG's 1.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $136.7B | $38.9B | $106.6B | $33.8B | $825.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.1B | $38.9B | $32.4B | $125.5B | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.14x | 10.41x | 19.33x | 9.47x | 15.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.09x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.01x | 13.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | 0.88x | 1.32x | 1.02x | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.06x | 6.62x | 3.63x | 22.42x | 13.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 1.11x | 1.94x | 1.23x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.99x | 1.63x | 0.88x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.64x | — | — | 7.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHG. JPM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFG's 5.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHG scores 9/9 vs KB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +9.6% | +9.1% | +8.5% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +4.9% | +1.3% | +2.5% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | — | +2.1% | +1.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.93x | — | 5.79x | 2.77x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17.29T | $0 | -$11.60T | $133.07T | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75.59T | $0 | $72.48T | $21.14T | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58.30T | $0 | $60.89T | $154.21T | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 0.65x | 0.28x | 0.41x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMFG five years ago would be worth $31,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,350 for SHG. Over the past 12 months, SHG leads with a +89.9% total return vs JPM's +25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KB at 46.0% vs JPM's 32.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | +28.3% | +16.9% | +26.3% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.4% | +70.3% | +78.3% | +89.9% | +25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.6% | +211.2% | +206.8% | +168.8% | +134.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.8% | +130.8% | +209.1% | +103.5% | +104.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +314.9% | +355.3% | +240.7% | +148.9% | +461.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.0% | +46.0% | +45.3% | +39.0% | +32.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHG is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KB's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHG currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs MFG's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.22x | 1.12x | 0.89x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.34 | $119.71 | $10.28 | $73.40 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.90 | $65.31 | $4.89 | $35.96 | $248.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +91.7% | +84.2% | +92.3% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.6 | 58.1 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 249K | 4.6M | 304K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMFG and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMFG as "Hold", KB as "Hold", MFG as "Hold", SHG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.5% upside for MFG (target: $10) vs 10.6% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, SMFG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.14% vs JPM's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | — | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — | +1.8% | +2.7% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $105.47 | — | $24.08 | $2641.09 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +2.6% | +3.5% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SMFG vs KB vs MFG vs SHG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KB Financial Group Inc.
(KB) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KB Financial Group Inc. wins at 0. 00x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
(SMFG) delivered a total return of +218. 8%, compared to +103. 5% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +461. 3% versus SHG's +148. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus KB Financial Group Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning KB is approximately 37% more volatile than SHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KB Financial Group Inc.
(KB) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus 9. 5% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 30. 7% year-over-year, compared to 20. 1% for KB Financial Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 10. 3% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 13. 8% for MFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MFG: 15. 5% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM?
In this comparison, SMFG (3.
1% yield), SHG (2. 7% yield), MFG (1. 8% yield), JPM (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. KB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMFG or KB or MFG or SHG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +461. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +461. 3%, KB: +355. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMFG and KB and MFG and SHG and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMFG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. SMFG, MFG, SHG, JPM pay a dividend while KB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.