Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $13.30B | $6.91B | $30.30B | $3.19B | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $51M | $0.00 | $62M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.21B | $-315M | $-1.37B | $-102M | $-450M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.2% | — | 97.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.0% | — | -178.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $21M | $82M | $159M | $34M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $357M | $384M | $112M | $262M |
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) | 100 | 234.0 | +134.0% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 497.6 | +397.6% |
| Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX) | 100 | 234.3 | +134.3% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 561.1 | +461.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SMMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KYMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- -22.3% ROA vs SMMT's -243.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -220.2%
RVMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 1.08
- Beta 1.08 vs SMMT's 1.89
TNGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
- 48.3% revenue growth vs SMMT's -402.6%
- +19.4% vs SMMT's -29.4%
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs RVMD's 393.1%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- 3.2% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.3% revenue growth vs SMMT's -402.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs SMMT's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs SMMT's -29.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs SMMT's -243.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -220.2% |
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNGX leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • RVMD leads 1 • SMMT leads 0 • NUVL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNGX and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $62M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -162.9% (TNGX) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $51M | $0 | $62M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.0B | -$352M | -$1.4B | -$109M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.2B | -$315M | -$1.4B | -$102M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$385M | -$244M | -$1.1B | -$140M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +33.2% | — | +97.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.0% | — | -178.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.1% | — | -162.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.7% | — | -2.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.5% | — | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -166.7% | +13.4% | -102.7% | +11.8% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TNGX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.3B | $6.9B | $30.3B | $3.2B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $6.6B | $30.1B | $3.1B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.91x | -22.93x | -23.95x | -26.99x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 176.26x | — | 51.17x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.46x | 4.52x | 16.61x | 7.88x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SMMT. SMMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RVMD's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -25.0% | -83.2% | -50.3% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | -22.3% | -59.1% | -36.3% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | -24.9% | -54.3% | -38.5% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | -27.2% | -53.0% | -34.0% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.10x | 0.10x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$204M | -$275M | -$225M | -$79M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $357M | $384M | $112M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $82M | $159M | $34M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2119.53x | -81.62x | — | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SMMT and TNGX and NUVL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,212 for KYMR. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +1941.7% total return vs SMMT's -29.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMMT at 106.8% vs NUVL's 39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +16.3% | +80.3% | +162.9% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.4% | +190.7% | +278.4% | +1941.7% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +784.0% | +205.1% | +483.1% | +582.6% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.7% | +92.1% | +382.1% | +117.2% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.6% | +154.4% | +393.1% | +129.5% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +106.8% | +45.0% | +80.0% | +89.7% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RVMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMMT's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs SMMT's 55.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.15x | 1.08x | 1.81x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.98 | $103.00 | $155.70 | $28.41 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.83 | $28.06 | $34.00 | $1.03 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.4% | +82.2% | +91.5% | +82.6% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 54.1 | 66.4 | 53.4 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 602K | 2.9M | 3.4M | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMMT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", RVMD as "Buy", TNGX as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs -3.1% for TNGX (target: $23).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.33 | $117.06 | $154.80 | $22.75 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 26 | 22 | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TNGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KYMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs TNGX vs NUVL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to +92. 1% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus SMMT's +91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Summit Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning SMMT is approximately 74% more volatile than RVMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 10% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tango Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -364. 5% for Summit Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNGX leads at 35. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL?
Summit Therapeutics Inc.
(SMMT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMMT leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SMMT or KYMR or RVMD or TNGX or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +446. 1% 10Y return). Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +446. 1%, SMMT: +91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMMT and KYMR and RVMD and TNGX and NUVL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.