Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $871M | $4.62B | $12.05B | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.83B | $0.00 | $14.33B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $-33M | $362M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 8.0% | 18.9% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 2.8% | 9.6% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 13.5x | 11.3x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $682M | $3.52B | $4.18B | $540M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $476M | $2.31B | $771M |
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Motor Prod… (SMP) | 100 | 92.5 | -7.5% |
| Dana Incorporated (DAN) | 100 | 273.4 | +173.4% |
| BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| Visteon Corporation (VC) | 100 | 156.0 | +56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth -23.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.13x
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.1%, current ratio 2.13x
DAN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 210.7% 10Y total return vs BWA's 114.1%
- +139.1% vs VC's +40.3%
BWA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 5.3% margin vs DAN's 1.1%
- 6.1% ROA vs DAN's -0.4%, ROIC 19.5% vs 4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs DAN's -27.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs DAN's 1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs DAN's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DAN's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +139.1% vs VC's +40.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs DAN's -0.4%, ROIC 19.5% vs 4.0% |
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMP leads in 3 of 6 categories
VC leads 1 • DAN leads 1 • BWA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWA and DAN operate at a comparable scale, with $14.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.3% (VC) to 1.1% (DAN). On growth, SMP holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $0 | $14.3B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $229M | $354M | $1.9B | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | -$33M | $362M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $298M | $1.6B | $305M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +8.0% | +18.9% | +13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +2.8% | +9.6% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +1.1% | +2.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.0% | +11.1% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -3.7% | +0.5% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.9% | -120.0% | +61.1% | -0.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, VC trades at a 71% valuation discount to DAN's 54.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VC's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAN's 13.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $871M | $4.6B | $12.0B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $7.7B | $13.9B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.38x | 54.00x | 45.45x | 15.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.95x | 13.54x | 11.28x | 13.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.50x | 13.44x | 6.81x | 6.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.62x | 0.84x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 5.23x | 2.24x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.55x | 15.51x | 10.22x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VC delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DAN. VC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DAN's 3.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWA scores 8/9 vs DAN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | -2.5% | +6.2% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | -0.4% | +2.6% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +4.0% | +12.9% | +19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +4.5% | +12.7% | +15.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 3.82x | 0.74x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $610M | $3.0B | $1.9B | -$231M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $476M | $2.3B | $771M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $682M | $3.5B | $4.2B | $540M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.79x | 0.77x | 10.46x | 124.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAN five years ago would be worth $13,642 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,912 for VC. Over the past 12 months, DAN leads with a +139.1% total return vs VC's +40.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAN at 36.4% vs VC's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +39.0% | +25.1% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.7% | +139.1% | +94.2% | +40.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | +153.6% | +50.8% | -17.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.3% | +36.4% | +28.7% | -10.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.9% | +210.7% | +114.1% | +52.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | +36.4% | +14.7% | -6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMP and DAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAN's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAN currently trades 87.4% from its 52-week high vs BWA's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.37x | 1.01x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.00 | $39.56 | $70.08 | $129.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.91 | $14.48 | $29.41 | $80.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +87.4% | +83.0% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 49.3 | 65.7 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 1.1M | 2.3M | 601K |
Analyst Outlook
SMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMP as "Buy", DAN as "Buy", BWA as "Buy", VC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.3% upside for BWA (target: $69) vs 7.1% for DAN (target: $37). For income investors, SMP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.08% vs VC's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.00 | $68.80 | $121.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 24 | 38 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $0.39 | $0.55 | $0.54 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.1% | +4.2% | +1.9% |
SMP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SMP vs DAN vs BWA vs VC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMP or DAN or BWA or VC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). Visteon Corporation (VC) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
On trailing P/E, Visteon Corporation (VC) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus Dana Incorporated at 54. 0x. On forward P/E, Standard Motor Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
Over the past 5 years, Dana Incorporated (DAN) delivered a total return of +36.
4%, compared to -10. 9% for Visteon Corporation (VC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAN returned +210. 7% versus SMP's +29. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Dana Incorporated's 1. 37β — meaning DAN is approximately 69% more volatile than SMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Visteon Corporation (VC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 4% for Dana Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dana Incorporated grew EPS 264. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for Visteon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMP leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
Visteon Corporation (VC) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Dana Incorporated — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMP leads at 10. 3% versus 2. 8% for DAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMP leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMP or DAN or BWA or VC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for Dana Incorporated — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWA: 18. 3% to $68. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMP or DAN or BWA or VC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 5% for Visteon Corporation (VC).
09Is SMP or DAN or BWA or VC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMP: +29. 9%, VC: +52. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMP and DAN and BWA and VC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; DAN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VC is a small-cap deep-value stock. SMP, DAN, BWA pay a dividend while VC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.