Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
Semiconductors
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $219M | $4.78T | $2.92T | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $150M | $422.57B | $742.78B | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $160.21B | $90.80B | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 60.4% | 50.6% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 32.7% | 11.5% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.5x | 34.8x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $59.29B | $152.99B | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $30.71B | $86.81B | $7.84B |
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 388.2 | +288.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 148.7 | +48.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMRT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GOOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 1.09 vs QCOM's 9.06
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 34.8x)
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SMRT's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs SMRT's -16.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs SMRT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.3% vs SMRT's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs SMRT's -7.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -19.6% |
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOG leads in 4 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 1 • SMRT leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 4962.9x SMRT's $150M. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMRT's -16.6%. On growth, GOOG holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $150M | $422.6B | $742.8B | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $161.3B | $155.9B | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $160.2B | $90.8B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $73.3B | -$2.5B | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +60.4% | +50.6% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +32.7% | +11.5% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +37.9% | +12.2% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +17.3% | -0.3% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +21.8% | +16.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | +81.9% | +74.8% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMRT and QCOM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.6x trailing earnings, GOOG trades at a 10% valuation discount to QCOM's 40.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOG offers better value at 1.23x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $219M | $4.78T | $2.92T | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $122M | $4.81T | $2.98T | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.56x | 36.57x | 37.82x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.45x | 34.77x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 1.35x | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.01x | 20.47x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 11.87x | 4.07x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 11.64x | 7.14x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.27x | 378.98x | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SMRT. SMRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOG scores 7/9 vs SMRT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +39.0% | +23.3% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | +27.4% | +11.5% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.6% | +25.1% | +14.7% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +30.3% | +15.3% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.14x | 0.37x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | $28.6B | $66.2B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $30.7B | $86.8B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $59.3B | $153.0B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -78.29x | 392.15x | 39.96x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $33,098 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,046 for SMRT. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +159.3% total return vs SMRT's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 54.2% vs SMRT's -24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.9% | +25.4% | +19.7% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.9% | +159.3% | +43.7% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | +266.7% | +156.2% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +231.0% | +64.8% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +1013.4% | +697.8% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.8% | +54.2% | +36.8% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOG is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMRT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOG currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SMRT's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.23x | 1.51x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $397.28 | $278.56 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $149.49 | $185.01 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +99.5% | +97.3% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.9 | 82.8 | 81.1 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 905K | 19.1M | 45.5M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMRT as "Hold", GOOG as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SMRT (target: $4) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs GOOG's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $383.41 | $306.77 | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 79 | 94 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
GOOG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SMRT vs GOOG vs AMZN vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) offers the better valuation at 36. 6x trailing P/E (32. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the cheapest at 36. 6x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 1. 09x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) delivered a total return of +231. 0%, compared to -89. 5% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOG returned +1013% versus SMRT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus SmartRent, Inc. 's 1. 78β — meaning SMRT is approximately 45% more volatile than GOOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -12. 9% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -88. 2% for SmartRent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOG leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -39. 8% for SmartRent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOG leads at 32. 1% versus -24. 7% for SMRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOG leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMRT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), GOOG (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SMRT, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMRT or GOOG or AMZN or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), +1013% 10Y return). SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOG: +1013%, SMRT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMRT and GOOG and AMZN and QCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMRT (Technology) and GOOG (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOG is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while SMRT, GOOG, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.