Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMTC vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
SMTC vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $11.01B | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 52.0% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 70.3x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $552M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $10.61B |
SMTC vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2338.6 | +2238.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMTC vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +251.7% vs NVDA's +82.9%
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs SMTC's 450.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 70.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs SMTC's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +251.7% vs NVDA's +82.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs SMTC's 2.0%, ROIC 81.8% vs 4.9% |
SMTC vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMTC vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 210.3x SMTC's $1.0B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTC's 2.8%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $173M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $143M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.4% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMTC and NVDA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NVDA's 37.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 102.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.0B | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.4B | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.76x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.34x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 102.71x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.10x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.74x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 251.37x | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMTC. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMTC scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $400M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $552M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.45x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,918 for SMTC. Over the past 12 months, SMTC leads with a +251.7% total return vs NVDA's +82.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs SMTC's 85.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.4% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +251.7% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.3% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.2% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +450.3% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.2% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMTC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMTC currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs NVDA's 95.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.27 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.06 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMTC as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.3% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -26.7% for SMTC (target: $87).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.44 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SMTC vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMTC or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 42. 4x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semtech Corporation (SMTC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMTC or NVDA?
On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMTC or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to +89.
2% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus SMTC's +450. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMTC or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 58% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMTC or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMTC or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 6. 8% for SMTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMTC or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
1x forward P/E versus 70. 3x for Semtech Corporation — 45. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 34. 3% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMTC or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMTC or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+234.
3% 10Y return). Semtech Corporation (SMTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +234. 3%, SMTC: +450. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMTC and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.