Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMTI
Sanara MedTech Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$164M
5Y Perf.+55.3%
KROS
Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$449M
5Y Perf.-58.0%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.18B
5Y Perf.+125.4%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.88B
5Y Perf.+12.8%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$74.28B
5Y Perf.+16.7%

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMTI logoSMTI
KROS logoKROS
ARWR logoARWR
IMVT logoIMVT
REGN logoREGN
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$164M$449M$10.18B$5.88B$74.28B
Revenue (TTM)$103M$244M$622M$0.00$14.92B
Net Income (TTM)$-38M$87M$-301M$-464M$4.42B
Gross Margin92.7%99.5%88.1%84.5%
Operating Margin4.9%28.9%-35.7%24.3%
Forward P/E160.0x5.2x15.5x
Total Debt$48M$17M$366M$98K$2.71B
Cash & Equiv.$17M$287M$227M$714M$3.12B

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMTI
KROS
ARWR
IMVT
REGN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sanara MedTech Inc. (SMTI)100155.3+55.3%
Keros Therapeutics,… (KROS)10042.0-58.0%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100225.4+125.4%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100112.8+12.8%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)100116.7+16.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KROS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. REGN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SMTI
Sanara MedTech Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

SMTI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KROS
Keros Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KROS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 15.45x
  • Beta 1.00, current ratio 15.45x
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 15.5x)
  • 35.7% margin vs ARWR's -48.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 11.6% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
  • +448.5% vs SMTI's -43.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

REGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 0.5%
  • Beta 0.77 vs ARWR's 1.74, lower leverage
  • 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
ValueKROS logoKROSLower P/E (5.2x vs 15.5x)
Quality / MarginsKROS logoKROS35.7% margin vs ARWR's -48.4%
Stability / SafetyREGN logoREGNBeta 0.77 vs ARWR's 1.74, lower leverage
DividendsREGN logoREGN0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+448.5% vs SMTI's -43.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KROS logoKROS13.3% ROA vs SMTI's -49.2%, ROIC 167.9% vs 11.8%

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMTISanara MedTech Inc.
FY 2023
Royalty
100.0%$201,000
KROSKeros Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
License
84.1%$205M
Service, Other
15.9%$39M
ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKROSLAGGINGREGN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

REGN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. KROS is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARWR's -48.4%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$103M$244M$622M$0$14.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8M$72M-$203M-$487M$4.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$38M$87M-$301M-$464M$4.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$106M-$51M-$423M$4.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.7%+99.5%+88.1%+84.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+28.9%-35.7%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-36.4%+35.7%-48.4%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%+43.4%-8.2%+27.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.6%-87.3%-86.4%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+66.7%-133.8%+19.7%-7.2%
KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KROS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, KROS trades at a 70% valuation discount to REGN's 17.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KROS's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 84.4x.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Market CapShares × price$164M$449M$10.2B$5.9B$74.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$196M$179M$10.3B$5.2B$73.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.22x5.25x-5957.38x-10.60x17.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.160.00x15.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.66x2.48x84.38x17.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.59x1.84x12.27x5.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share26.76x1.51x19.31x6.20x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF76.04x4.24x64.87x18.20x
KROS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-179 for SMTI. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTI's 8.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-178.6%+14.3%-55.5%-47.1%+14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-49.2%+13.3%-18.1%-44.1%+11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.8%+167.9%+9.3%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.6%+15.6%+8.8%-66.1%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945625
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage8.13x0.06x0.73x0.00x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$32M-$271M$140M-$714M-$412M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$287M$227M$714M$3.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$48M$17M$366M$98,000$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.97x-1.03x108.44x
IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $18,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,437 for KROS. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +448.5% total return vs SMTI's -43.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 21.6% vs KROS's -34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.3%-34.9%+7.2%+11.7%-7.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-43.2%-13.9%+448.5%+102.4%+31.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%-72.0%+79.7%+49.8%-4.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.8%-75.6%+10.0%+84.4%+43.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+206.7%-39.9%+1161.8%+190.9%+91.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.6%-34.6%+21.6%+14.4%-1.5%
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs SMTI's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x1.00x1.74x1.36x0.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.95$22.55$79.48$30.09$821.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.04$10.41$12.44$13.36$476.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.2%+53.5%+91.4%+96.2%+87.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.849.466.350.641.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K411K1.9M1.4M626K
Evenly matched — IMVT and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SMTI as "Buy", KROS as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 750.0% upside for KROS (target: $103) vs 13.3% for ARWR (target: $82). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSMTI logoSMTISanara MedTech In…KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.00$102.60$82.33$45.50$865.68
# AnalystsCovering analysts316202348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+83.5%0.0%0.0%+5.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KROS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallKeros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMTI vs KROS vs ARWR vs IMVT vs REGN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sanara MedTech Inc. (SMTI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

On trailing P/E, Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

(KROS) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +84. 4%, compared to -75. 6% for Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1162% versus KROS's -39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning ARWR is approximately 126% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Sanara MedTech Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Keros Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 146. 0% year-over-year, compared to -282. 5% for Sanara MedTech Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

(KROS) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 7% net margin versus -36. 4% for Sanara MedTech Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KROS leads at 28. 9% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 160. 0x for Sanara MedTech Inc. — 144. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KROS: 750. 0% to $102. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN?

In this comparison, REGN (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. SMTI, KROS, ARWR, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SMTI or KROS or ARWR or IMVT or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +91. 6%, SMTI: +206. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMTI and KROS and ARWR and IMVT and REGN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMTI is a small-cap high-growth stock; KROS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SMTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KROS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REGN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SMTI and KROS and ARWR and IMVT and REGN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SMTI: 4.6% · KROS: -87.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.