Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2M | $325.54B | $20.25B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $178K | $28.37B | $4.07B | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $7.00B | $327M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | -62.4% | 48.7% | 45.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -58.2% | 29.2% | 14.8% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.1x | 30.4x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $72K | $6.55B | $4.69B | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $7.24B | $675M | $360M |
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 100 | 305.9 | +205.9% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 199.7 | +99.7% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 203.7%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.72x
- Beta 1.84, current ratio 3.72x
- 203.7% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
AMAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.14, yield 0.4%
- 20.1% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- 24.7% margin vs SMTK's -62.6%
- 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x)
- +306.1% vs SMTK's -85.0%
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 203.7% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.7% margin vs SMTK's -62.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.84 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs SMTK's -85.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs SMTK's -343.2% |
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 2 • SMTK leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.4B annually — 159370.8x SMTK's $178,000. AMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTK's -62.6%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $178,000 | $28.4B | $4.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $8.4B | $945M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $7.0B | $327M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $5.7B | $401M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -62.4% | +48.7% | +45.2% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.2% | +29.2% | +14.8% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.6% | +24.7% | +8.0% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | +20.1% | +9.8% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.5% | +15.2% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.7% | +13.9% | +53.2% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 47.4x trailing earnings, AMAT trades at a 50% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMAT's 38.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $325.5B | $20.2B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $324.9B | $24.3B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | 47.40x | 68.83x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.07x | 30.36x | 41.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.76x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.68x | 26.70x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.49x | 11.48x | 5.15x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 16.25x | 7.49x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 57.13x | 40.74x | 56.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-141 for SMTK. SMTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMAT scores 7/9 vs SMTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -140.5% | +34.3% | +12.2% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | +19.3% | +3.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +33.3% | +6.5% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -129.8% | +30.6% | +7.2% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.32x | 1.73x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$686M | $4.0B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $7.2B | $675M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72,000 | $6.6B | $4.7B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13274.00x | 35.46x | 2.84x | 2.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMAT five years ago would be worth $31,383 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for SMTK. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs SMTK's -85.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs SMTK's -60.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.4% | +52.9% | +78.8% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.0% | +164.7% | +306.1% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +258.7% | +266.0% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +213.8% | +66.5% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +2014.4% | +750.6% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.3% | +53.1% | +54.1% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMTK and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMTK is the less volatile stock with a 1.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMAT currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs SMTK's 8.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 2.14x | 2.64x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.80 | $432.81 | $326.83 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $151.51 | $71.49 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.7% | +94.8% | +92.0% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 66.3 | 65.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 682K | 6.0M | 1.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMAT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.9% upside for AMAT (target: $426) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, AMAT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.42% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $426.39 | $272.86 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.71 | $0.87 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SMTK vs AMAT vs MKSI vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SmartKem, Inc.
(SMTK) is the stronger pick with 203. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) offers the better valuation at 47. 4x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the cheapest at 47. 4x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -99. 6% for SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMAT returned +20. 1% versus SMTK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SmartKem, Inc.
(SMTK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 84β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 45% more volatile than SMTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartKem, Inc.
(SMTK) is pulling ahead at 203. 7% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Entegris, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTK leads at 65. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -126. 0% for SmartKem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus -127. 6% for SMTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMTK leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Entegris, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMAT: 3. 9% to $426. 39.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG?
In this comparison, AMAT (0.
4% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SMTK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMTK or AMAT or MKSI or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMTK and AMAT and MKSI and ENTG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.