Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SNAX logo
SNAX
HIMS logo
HIMS
NXRT logo
NXRT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SNAX
Stryve Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$144K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.62B
5Y Perf.+157.1%
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$696M
5Y Perf.-17.8%

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SNAX logoSNAX
HIMS logoHIMS
NXRT logoNXRT
IndustryPackaged FoodsMedical - Equipment & ServicesREIT - Residential
Market Cap$144K$6.62B$696M
Revenue (TTM)$19M$2.37B$252M
Net Income (TTM)$-15M$-13M$-32M
Gross Margin10.5%67.6%91.1%
Operating Margin-60.4%1.3%11.5%
Forward P/E59.2x
Total Debt$24M$1.26B$1.56B
Cash & Equiv.$369K$229M$14M

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SNAX
HIMS
NXRT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX)1000.0-100.0%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100257.1+157.1%
NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT)10082.2-17.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NXRT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇NXRT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SNAX
Stryve Foods, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SNAX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 207.9% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 170.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.48, current ratio 1.90x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NXRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 7.7%
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.53 vs HIMS's 2.48
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
ValueNXRT logoNXRTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIMS logoHIMS-0.6% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
Stability / SafetyNXRT logoNXRTBeta 0.53 vs HIMS's 2.48
DividendsNXRT logoNXRT7.7% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NXRT logoNXRT-9.7% vs SNAX's -87.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS-0.6% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 8.6% vs -39.0%

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the GLP-1 Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the GLP-1 Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SNAXStryve Foods, Inc.
FY 2021
Wholesale
45.4%$14M
e-Commerce
36.1%$11M
Private Label
18.5%$6M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NXRTNexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXRTLAGGINGSNAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 122.4x SNAX's $19M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAX's -79.1%. On growth, SNAX holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$2.4B$252M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M$99M$125M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$15M-$13M-$32M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$76M$79M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.5%+67.6%+91.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-60.4%+1.3%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.1%-0.6%-12.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-32.2%+3.2%+31.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+3.8%+0.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.6%-3.0%0.0%
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, NXRT's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 47.8x.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
Market CapShares × price$143,748$6.6B$696M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$24M$7.7B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x59.16x-21.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple47.84x18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x2.82x2.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.05x14.40x2.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF89.56x8.32x
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a -2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SNAX. HIMS carries lower financial leverage with a 2.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAX's 15.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIMS scores 4/9 vs SNAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%-2.5%-10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-47.8%-0.6%-1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.0%+8.6%+1.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-62.4%+9.4%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage15.06x2.34x5.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M$1.0B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$369,114$229M$14M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$1.3B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.69x0.47x
HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $24,996 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SNAX. Over the past 12 months, NXRT leads with a -9.7% total return vs SNAX's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 50.8% vs SNAX's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1000.0%-9.7%-3.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%-49.5%-9.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+242.8%-27.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+150.0%-35.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+207.9%+170.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.1%+50.8%-10.1%
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SNAX and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SNAX is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXRT currently trades 78.2% from its 52-week high vs SNAX's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-3.16x2.48x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.39$70.43$35.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$13.74$23.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.5%+42.8%+78.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.451.550.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded58424.7M160K
Evenly matched — SNAX and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NXRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.5% upside for NXRT (target: $27) vs -10.5% for HIMS (target: $27). NXRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.00$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2010
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+1.1%
NXRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NXRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HIMS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallNexPoint Residential Trust,… (NXRT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SNAX vs HIMS vs NXRT: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SNAX or HIMS or NXRT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 59. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SNAX or HIMS or NXRT?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +150. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +207. 9% versus SNAX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SNAX or HIMS or NXRT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryve Foods, Inc.

(SNAX) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 16β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately -179% more volatile than SNAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 15% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SNAX or HIMS or NXRT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryve Foods, Inc. grew EPS 47. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SNAX or HIMS or NXRT?

Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -107. 5% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXRT leads at 11. 1% versus -87. 1% for SNAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — SNAX or HIMS or NXRT?

In this comparison, NXRT (7.

7% yield) pays a dividend. SNAX, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is SNAX or HIMS or NXRT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryve Foods, Inc.

(SNAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 16)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNAX: -100. 0%, HIMS: +207. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between SNAX and HIMS and NXRT?

These companies operate in different sectors (SNAX (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and NXRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SNAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT pays a dividend while SNAX, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.