Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Grocery Stores
Discount Stores
Banks - Diversified
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Grocery Stores | Discount Stores | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $144K | $1.47B | $1.25B | $40.54B | $963.06B | $892.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $3.00B | $1.45B | $147.64B | $725.30B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $133M | $91M | $1.02B | $23.06B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 26.6% | 34.0% | 22.3% | 25.0% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -60.4% | 10.6% | 14.4% | 1.3% | 4.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 7.5x | 12.2x | 41.6x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $2.29B | $304M | $24.68B | $67.09B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369K | $325M | $98M | $3.33B | $10.73B | $343.34B |
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 47.3 | -52.7% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 62.0 | -38.0% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 289.9 | +189.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 318.2 | +218.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, SNAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 91.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.10, yield 6.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.3x)
SMPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs WMT's 3.78
- 9.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
KR doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +29.2% vs SNAX's -87.3%
- 8.1% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 14.4% vs -39.0%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 475.6% 10Y total return vs WMT's 441.8%
- 20.4% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs SNAX's -79.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.2% vs SNAX's -87.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 14.4% vs -39.0% |
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • SNAX leads 1 • NOMD leads 0 • SMPL leads 0 • KR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 37456.4x SNAX's $19M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAX's -79.1%. On growth, SNAX holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $3.0B | $1.4B | $147.6B | $725.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $429M | $231M | $5.5B | $41.4B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $133M | $91M | $1.0B | $23.1B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $227M | $174M | $3.5B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +26.6% | +34.0% | +22.3% | +25.0% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | +10.6% | +14.4% | +1.3% | +4.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.1% | +4.4% | +6.3% | +0.7% | +3.2% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.2% | +7.6% | +12.0% | +2.4% | +1.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | -4.4% | -0.3% | +1.2% | +7.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | 0.0% | -31.6% | +50.0% | +19.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SNAX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 78% valuation discount to WMT's 44.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs WMT's 4.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $143,748 | $1.5B | $1.2B | $40.5B | $963.1B | $892.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $3.7B | $1.5B | $61.9B | $1.02T | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 9.77x | 12.26x | 41.60x | 44.26x | 15.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.86x | 7.48x | 12.23x | 41.59x | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — | 4.02x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.43x | 6.00x | 10.65x | 23.15x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.42x | 0.86x | 0.27x | 1.35x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 0.54x | 0.70x | 7.07x | 9.13x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.01x | 7.90x | 12.10x | 64.53x | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SNAX. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAX's 15.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs SNAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +5.3% | +5.2% | +13.0% | +22.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.8% | +2.1% | +3.7% | +2.0% | +8.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.0% | +5.5% | +8.1% | +5.0% | +14.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.4% | +6.2% | +9.4% | +5.5% | +17.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 15.06x | 0.92x | 0.17x | 4.16x | 0.63x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $2.0B | $206M | $21.3B | $56.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369,114 | $325M | $98M | $3.3B | $10.7B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $2.3B | $304M | $24.7B | $67.1B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.69x | 2.64x | 6.77x | 2.59x | 11.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $26,775 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SNAX. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +29.2% total return vs SNAX's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 32.9% vs SNAX's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1000.0% | -12.3% | -36.0% | +2.9% | +7.6% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.3% | -35.9% | -62.1% | -0.8% | +29.2% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -33.8% | -65.1% | +47.8% | +134.8% | +133.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.8% | -64.7% | +84.3% | +167.7% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +34.2% | +4.3% | +103.5% | +441.8% | +475.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.1% | -12.9% | -29.6% | +13.9% | +32.9% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNAX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNAX is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SNAX's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -3.16x | 0.10x | 0.19x | -0.67x | -0.00x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.39 | $18.33 | $34.19 | $76.58 | $135.16 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $8.99 | $10.21 | $58.60 | $93.62 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.5% | +56.3% | +36.6% | +83.7% | +89.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 60.8 | 57.1 | 49.5 | 47.2 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 584 | 1.3M | 2.8M | 5.2M | 18.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOMD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NOMD as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy", KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for NOMD (target: $14) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, NOMD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.84% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.50 | $15.00 | $74.25 | $139.44 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 24 | 44 | 66 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.8% | — | +2.1% | +0.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 52 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | — | $1.35 | $0.94 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +16.0% | +4.1% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +3.9% |
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SNAX vs NOMD vs SMPL vs KR vs WMT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
8x versus Walmart Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +167. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus SNAX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 16β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -130% more volatile than SNAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 15% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryve Foods, Inc. grew EPS 47. 0% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -107. 5% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -87. 1% for SNAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Walmart Inc. — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOMD: 30. 8% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM?
In this comparison, NOMD (6.
8% yield), KR (2. 1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SNAX, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNAX or NOMD or SMPL or KR or WMT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNAX: -100. 0%, SMPL: +4. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNAX and NOMD and SMPL and KR and WMT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNAX (Consumer Defensive) and NOMD (Consumer Defensive) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and KR (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SNAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. NOMD, KR, WMT, JPM pay a dividend while SNAX, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.