Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $144K | $1.25B | $1.47B | $348M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1.45B | $3.00B | $521M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $91M | $133M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 34.0% | 26.6% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -60.4% | 14.4% | 10.6% | -51.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 6.9x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $304M | $2.29B | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369K | $98M | $325M | $18M |
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 62.0 | -38.0% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 47.3 | -52.7% |
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 48.1 | -51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNAX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- 9.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
- 6.3% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 6.8%
- 34.2% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 4.3%
- Beta 0.10, yield 6.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
MGPI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs SNAX's -79.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs MGPI's 0.45 | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MGPI's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.9% vs SNAX's -87.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -39.0% |
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
NOMD leads 2 • SNAX leads 0 • MGPI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 154.9x SNAX's $19M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAX's -79.1%. On growth, SNAX holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1.4B | $3.0B | $521M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $231M | $429M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $91M | $133M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $174M | $227M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +34.0% | +26.6% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | +14.4% | +10.6% | -51.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.1% | +6.3% | +4.4% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.2% | +12.0% | +7.6% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | -0.3% | -4.4% | -12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | -31.6% | 0.0% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNAX and MGPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 20% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NOMD's 7.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $143,748 | $1.2B | $1.5B | $348M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $1.5B | $3.7B | $597M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 12.26x | 9.77x | -3.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.48x | 6.86x | 10.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.00x | 7.43x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.86x | 0.42x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 0.70x | 0.54x | 0.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.90x | 5.01x | 4.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NOMD delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SNAX. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAX's 15.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs SNAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +5.2% | +5.3% | -32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.8% | +3.7% | +2.1% | -19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.0% | +8.1% | +5.5% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.4% | +9.4% | +6.2% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 15.06x | 0.17x | 0.92x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $206M | $2.0B | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369,114 | $98M | $325M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $304M | $2.3B | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.69x | 6.77x | 2.64x | -40.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NOMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOMD five years ago would be worth $3,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SNAX. Over the past 12 months, NOMD leads with a -35.9% total return vs SNAX's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NOMD at -12.9% vs SNAX's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1000.0% | -36.0% | -12.3% | -31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.3% | -62.1% | -35.9% | -43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -65.1% | -33.8% | -82.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -64.7% | -60.8% | -71.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +4.3% | +34.2% | -38.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.1% | -29.6% | -12.9% | -44.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNAX and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNAX is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGPI's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NOMD currently trades 56.3% from its 52-week high vs SNAX's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -3.16x | 0.19x | 0.10x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.39 | $34.19 | $18.33 | $33.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $10.21 | $8.99 | $15.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.5% | +36.6% | +56.3% | +48.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 57.1 | 60.8 | 35.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 584 | 2.8M | 1.3M | 180K |
Analyst Outlook
NOMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMPL as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy", MGPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 19.9% for SMPL (target: $15). For income investors, NOMD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.84% vs MGPI's 2.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $13.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 13 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.61 | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +16.0% | +0.3% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NOMD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
SNAX vs SMPL vs NOMD vs MGPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
8x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
Over the past 5 years, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) delivered a total return of -60.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOMD returned +34. 2% versus SNAX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 16β versus MGP Ingredients, Inc. 's 0. 45β — meaning MGPI is approximately -114% more volatile than SNAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 15% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryve Foods, Inc. grew EPS 47. 0% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -107. 5% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -87. 1% for SNAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGPI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 77. 9% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI?
In this comparison, NOMD (6.
8% yield), MGPI (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SNAX, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNAX or SMPL or NOMD or MGPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNAX: -100. 0%, SMPL: +4. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNAX and SMPL and NOMD and MGPI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NOMD, MGPI pay a dividend while SNAX, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.