SNDR vs ORCL

For growth investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger pick with 8.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 3% for Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Oracle Corporation (ORCL) offers the better valuation at 44. 7x trailing P/E (25. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oracle Corporation (ORCL) a "Buy" — based on 86 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the cheapest at 44.

7x versus Schneider National, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Oracle Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +153.

2%, compared to +25. 9% for Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +423. 1% versus SNDR's +87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Schneider National, Inc.

(SNDR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 25% more volatile than SNDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is pulling ahead at 8.

4% versus 7. 3% for Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oracle Corporation grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for Schneider National, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORCL leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 1. 8% for Schneider National, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus 3. 0% for SNDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) trades at 25.

9x forward P/E versus 35. 8x for Schneider National, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORCL: 32. 6% to $257. 19.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Schneider National, Inc.

(SNDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 2% yield). Oracle Corporation (ORCL) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNDR: +87. 4%, ORCL: +423. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SNDR (Industrials) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.