Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Trucking
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $5.37B | $559.27B | $203.58B | $10.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.67B | $64.08B | $36.80B | $7.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $16.21B | $7.04B | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 66.4% | 73.8% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 30.8% | 26.7% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 35.5x | 26.0x | 23.8x | 34.3x |
| Total Debt | $560M | $104.10B | $8.07B | $2.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $10.79B | $8.22B | $303M |
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider National,… (SNDR) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 361.8 | +261.8% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
| Knight-Swift Transp… (KNX) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs KNX's 156.2%
- 8.4% revenue growth vs KNX's 0.8%
- 25.3% margin vs KNX's 0.5%
SAP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.8%, current ratio 1.17x
- PEG 3.60 vs ORCL's 3.66
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
KNX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.4% vs SAP's -39.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs KNX's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.8x vs 26.0x), PEG 3.60 vs 3.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs KNX's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.4% vs SAP's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs KNX's 0.3%, ROIC 16.0% vs 2.0% |
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SAP leads 2 • SNDR leads 0 • KNX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 11.3x SNDR's $5.7B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KNX's 0.5%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $64.1B | $36.8B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $608M | $26.5B | $11.2B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $16.2B | $7.0B | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $493M | -$24.7B | $8.4B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +66.4% | +73.8% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +30.8% | +26.7% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +25.3% | +19.1% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -38.6% | +22.8% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +21.7% | +3.3% | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +24.5% | +15.4% | -104.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SAP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, SAP trades at a 84% valuation discount to KNX's 154.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAP offers better value at 3.76x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $559.3B | $203.6B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $652.6B | $203.4B | $12.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.95x | 44.82x | 24.82x | 154.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.49x | 25.99x | 23.79x | 34.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.31x | 3.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.26x | 27.36x | 15.54x | 12.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 9.74x | 4.71x | 1.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 26.59x | 3.86x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | — | 21.83x | 13.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $0 for KNX. SAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs KNX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +56.3% | +15.7% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +8.1% | +9.7% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +12.8% | +16.0% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +14.4% | +18.2% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 4.96x | 0.18x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $359M | $93.3B | -$149M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $10.8B | $8.2B | $303M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $560M | $104.1B | $8.1B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.92x | 5.44x | 8.49x | 1.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,324 for SNDR. Over the past 12 months, KNX leads with a +54.4% total return vs SAP's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs KNX's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | -0.1% | -25.4% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +31.6% | -39.6% | +54.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +106.5% | +35.5% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +151.8% | +33.3% | +34.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +425.1% | +151.1% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +27.3% | +10.7% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAP and KNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 55.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.59x | 0.89x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.34 | $345.72 | $313.28 | $67.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.11 | $134.57 | $160.68 | $38.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +56.3% | +55.8% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 68.5 | 48.6 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 963K | 26.3M | 3.3M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ORCL and SAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNDR as "Hold", ORCL as "Buy", SAP as "Buy", KNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs -3.2% for SNDR (target: $30). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.51% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.67 | $257.19 | $391.67 | $65.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 86 | 43 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.9% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 18 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.65 | $2.24 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.3% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SAP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SNDR vs ORCL vs SAP vs KNX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX). SAP SE (SAP) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oracle Corporation (ORCL) a "Buy" — based on 86 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
On trailing P/E, SAP SE (SAP) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. at 154. 7x. On forward P/E, SAP SE is actually cheaper at 23. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SAP SE wins at 3. 60x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to +23. 2% for Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +425. 1% versus SNDR's +86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAP SE (SAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 79% more volatile than SAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SAP SE (SAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus 0. 8% for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORCL leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 0. 9% for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus 3. 0% for SNDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAP leads at 73. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SAP SE (SAP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 60x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, SAP SE (SAP) trades at 23. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 5x for Schneider National, Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SAP SE (SAP) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 9% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL).
09Is SNDR or ORCL or SAP or KNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAP SE (SAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 1. 5% yield, +151. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAP: +151. 1%, KNX: +156. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNDR and ORCL and SAP and KNX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNDR (Industrials) and ORCL (Technology) and SAP (Technology) and KNX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.